linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	Nicolin Chen <b42378@freescale.com>,
	Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>, Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>,
	Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: Support allocate memory from internal SRAM (iram)
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 10:55:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3280558.aeNJFYEL58@steina-w> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240303-sdma_upstream-v1-1-869cd0165b09@nxp.com>

Hi Frank,

thanks for the patch.

Am Montag, 4. März 2024, 05:32:53 CET schrieb Frank Li:
> From: Nicolin Chen <b42378@freescale.com>
> 
> Allocate memory from SoC internal SRAM to reduce DDR access and keep DDR in
> lower power state (such as self-referesh) longer.
> 
> Check iram_pool before sdma_init() so that ccb/context could be allocated
> from iram because DDR maybe in self-referesh in lower power audio case
> while sdma still running.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <b42378@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joy Zou <joy.zou@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index 9b42f5e96b1e0..9a6d8f1e9ff63 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #include <linux/semaphore.h>
>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/genalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>  #include <linux/firmware.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -516,6 +517,7 @@ struct sdma_engine {
>  	void __iomem			*regs;
>  	struct sdma_context_data	*context;
>  	dma_addr_t			context_phys;
> +	dma_addr_t			ccb_phys;
>  	struct dma_device		dma_device;
>  	struct clk			*clk_ipg;
>  	struct clk			*clk_ahb;
> @@ -531,6 +533,7 @@ struct sdma_engine {
>  	/* clock ratio for AHB:SDMA core. 1:1 is 1, 2:1 is 0*/
>  	bool				clk_ratio;
>  	bool                            fw_loaded;
> +	struct gen_pool			*iram_pool;
>  };
>  
>  static int sdma_config_write(struct dma_chan *chan,
> @@ -1358,8 +1361,14 @@ static int sdma_request_channel0(struct sdma_engine *sdma)
>  {
>  	int ret = -EBUSY;
>  
> -	sdma->bd0 = dma_alloc_coherent(sdma->dev, PAGE_SIZE, &sdma->bd0_phys,
> -				       GFP_NOWAIT);
> +	if (sdma->iram_pool)
> +		sdma->bd0 = gen_pool_dma_alloc(sdma->iram_pool,
> +					sizeof(struct sdma_buffer_descriptor),
> +					&sdma->bd0_phys);
> +	else
> +		sdma->bd0 = dma_alloc_coherent(sdma->dev,
> +					sizeof(struct sdma_buffer_descriptor),
> +					&sdma->bd0_phys, GFP_NOWAIT);
>  	if (!sdma->bd0) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out;
> @@ -1379,10 +1388,14 @@ static int sdma_request_channel0(struct sdma_engine *sdma)
>  static int sdma_alloc_bd(struct sdma_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	u32 bd_size = desc->num_bd * sizeof(struct sdma_buffer_descriptor);
> +	struct sdma_engine *sdma = desc->sdmac->sdma;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	desc->bd = dma_alloc_coherent(desc->sdmac->sdma->dev, bd_size,
> -				      &desc->bd_phys, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +	if (sdma->iram_pool)
> +		desc->bd = gen_pool_dma_alloc(sdma->iram_pool, bd_size, &desc->bd_phys);
> +	else
> +		desc->bd = dma_alloc_coherent(sdma->dev, bd_size, &desc->bd_phys, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +
>  	if (!desc->bd) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto out;
> @@ -1394,9 +1407,12 @@ static int sdma_alloc_bd(struct sdma_desc *desc)
>  static void sdma_free_bd(struct sdma_desc *desc)
>  {
>  	u32 bd_size = desc->num_bd * sizeof(struct sdma_buffer_descriptor);
> +	struct sdma_engine *sdma = desc->sdmac->sdma;
>  
> -	dma_free_coherent(desc->sdmac->sdma->dev, bd_size, desc->bd,
> -			  desc->bd_phys);
> +	if (sdma->iram_pool)
> +		gen_pool_free(sdma->iram_pool, (unsigned long)desc->bd, bd_size);
> +	else
> +		dma_free_coherent(desc->sdmac->sdma->dev, bd_size, desc->bd, desc->bd_phys);
>  }
>  
>  static void sdma_desc_free(struct virt_dma_desc *vd)
> @@ -2066,8 +2082,8 @@ static int sdma_get_firmware(struct sdma_engine *sdma,
>  
>  static int sdma_init(struct sdma_engine *sdma)
>  {
> +	int ccbsize;
>  	int i, ret;
> -	dma_addr_t ccb_phys;

What is the motivation to put ccb_phys to struct sdma_engine? AFAICS
this is only used in sdma_init. Also the following patches of this series
are not using the struct member.

Best regards,
Alexander

>  
>  	ret = clk_enable(sdma->clk_ipg);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -2083,10 +2099,15 @@ static int sdma_init(struct sdma_engine *sdma)
>  	/* Be sure SDMA has not started yet */
>  	writel_relaxed(0, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_C0PTR);
>  
> -	sdma->channel_control = dma_alloc_coherent(sdma->dev,
> -			MAX_DMA_CHANNELS * sizeof(struct sdma_channel_control) +
> -			sizeof(struct sdma_context_data),
> -			&ccb_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	ccbsize = MAX_DMA_CHANNELS * (sizeof(struct sdma_channel_control)
> +		  + sizeof(struct sdma_context_data));
> +
> +	if (sdma->iram_pool)
> +		sdma->channel_control = gen_pool_dma_alloc(sdma->iram_pool,
> +							   ccbsize, &sdma->ccb_phys);
> +	else
> +		sdma->channel_control = dma_alloc_coherent(sdma->dev, ccbsize, &sdma->ccb_phys,
> +							   GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	if (!sdma->channel_control) {
>  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -2095,7 +2116,7 @@ static int sdma_init(struct sdma_engine *sdma)
>  
>  	sdma->context = (void *)sdma->channel_control +
>  		MAX_DMA_CHANNELS * sizeof(struct sdma_channel_control);
> -	sdma->context_phys = ccb_phys +
> +	sdma->context_phys = sdma->ccb_phys +
>  		MAX_DMA_CHANNELS * sizeof(struct sdma_channel_control);
>  
>  	/* disable all channels */
> @@ -2121,7 +2142,7 @@ static int sdma_init(struct sdma_engine *sdma)
>  	else
>  		writel_relaxed(0, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_CONFIG);
>  
> -	writel_relaxed(ccb_phys, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_C0PTR);
> +	writel_relaxed(sdma->ccb_phys, sdma->regs + SDMA_H_C0PTR);
>  
>  	/* Initializes channel's priorities */
>  	sdma_set_channel_priority(&sdma->channel[0], 7);
> @@ -2272,6 +2293,12 @@ static int sdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			vchan_init(&sdmac->vc, &sdma->dma_device);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (np) {
> +		sdma->iram_pool = of_gen_pool_get(np, "iram", 0);
> +		if (sdma->iram_pool)
> +			dev_info(&pdev->dev, "alloc bd from iram.\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = sdma_init(sdma);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto err_init;
> 
> 


-- 
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04  4:32 [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: fsl-sdma: Some improvement for fsl-sdma Frank Li
2024-03-04  4:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: Support allocate memory from internal SRAM (iram) Frank Li
2024-03-06  9:55   ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2024-03-06 15:23     ` Frank Li
2024-03-07  8:22       ` Joy Zou
2024-03-04  4:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: Support 24bit/3bytes for sg mode Frank Li
2024-03-07  9:05   ` Joy Zou
2024-03-04  4:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: Add multi fifo for DEV_TO_DEV Frank Li
2024-03-07  9:06   ` Joy Zou
2024-03-04  4:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: imx-sdma: Add i2c dma support Frank Li
2024-03-04 11:12   ` Fabio Estevam
2024-03-05 15:39     ` Frank Li
2024-03-06  8:24       ` Daniel Baluta
2024-03-07  8:34   ` Joy Zou
2024-03-04 11:41 ` [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: fsl-sdma: Some improvement for fsl-sdma Daniel Baluta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3280558.aeNJFYEL58@steina-w \
    --to=alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=b42378@freescale.com \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joy.zou@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).