From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8E1CA9EAE for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 05:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3B62173B for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 05:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="kSmv92Lt"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="p58WL8S1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BA3B62173B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ISLLCDzq++tja8v8WMFvOMkw4qVbMJjFyUffH3EzIbE=; b=kSmv92LtsfY8YC T3s61ygwP0jGpGRoYQ6mujT+fbG7CNKvS6LhA2Ni9ySMe5yQ0LDgNbPs5sUFt1LXqNfjUyt3scuok jlYa1HEqLzG0ATZuJkGTJ8lko9dS4nXo4OJn4SWHOGQ34IZ1tXXSFuO3QpX9BBtFQHT+hqousOKeK NjKcIm86Kn+bYtIfRPMmp1zeHuYLlIPW/iilMm0r2FFv0MI5TeYCtG0PXyVECtxABtOey9hkpSBtM L4x2MkNWfvRgqa2ZdnTsenLH4cNCh40A9oqyCsRDo+FCSOoXfagnEQO+oG/8fTzTjPuTzyqnlkVJl yIeNHtMbDoERQVy7B55Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iN9Pc-0007Gx-JP; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 05:42:24 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iN9PY-0007Fq-7W; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 05:42:22 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9N5gC3H022595; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:42:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1571809332; bh=loVH+PYRxm3OpLF9LdBwXFuK6Y4m05IaOaKEfYsJyAw=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=p58WL8S1GmDISYuKnhXNvZOeoUrdYkV463yym9NPfhRAo+iXa+g8Yy3fcFkrbFq25 yYJ1bfHdTyIVAT+qswO8C0xpw5FLvVQpuJgSjvVlzOopFBeuQic9qIgtN37tpmlq4o 7DZ7fqtNrh9Cic2tWE6XjqRuRNO/gF7vMzJfcSK0= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9N5gBAG020654 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:42:12 -0500 Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:42:01 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:42:01 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.233] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9N5ecZS004724; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:40:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] dt-bindings: phy-mtk-tphy: add a new reference clock To: Rob Herring , Chunfeng Yun References: <1567149298-29366-1-git-send-email-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> <1567149298-29366-4-git-send-email-chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com> <20190917202805.GA13405@bogus> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: <32bc288e-dbbb-8930-4750-826e9e17d58c@ti.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:10:09 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190917202805.GA13405@bogus> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191022_224220_312958_01661AE7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, On 18/09/19 1:58 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:14:51 +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote: >> Usually the digital and analog phys use the same reference clock, >> but on some platforms, they are separated, so add another optional >> clock to support it. >> In order to keep the clock names consistent with PHY IP's, use >> the da_ref for analog phy and ref clock for digital phy. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun >> --- >> v2: fix typo of analog and needed >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-mtk-tphy.txt | 7 +++++-- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring I see you've acked a couple of patches in the series. However the other dt-binding patch neither has an Ack or NAK. Is there a specific reason or can I merge the series? Thanks Kishon _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel