From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:52:23 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: Use EXYNOS4210_GPEx instead of EXYNOS4_GPEx In-Reply-To: References: <4648723.rWnut7F0uJ@amdc1227> <503D57EF.2090402@samsung.com> Message-ID: <3351890.rVcxVBV0WB@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wednesday 29 of August 2012 09:03:12 Kyungmin Park wrote: > On 8/29/12, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Please see my comments on Joonyoung Shim's previous patch... > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-May/101522.h > > tml > It's perference issue. some person like this style. others doesn't. > Moreever vender, System LSI, provided codes have whole different style. > It lists up whole gpios for each SoCs. > > EXYNOS4210_{A0, .... Z} > EXYNOS4412_{A0, .... V4} > EXYNOS5250_{A0, .... Z} > > anyway, just remain it as broken, and try to use pinctl as Thomas > mentioned. OK, I will drop this patchset for the time being. Let's get the pinctrl driver merged first and then investigate Exynos4x12 support in it. Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center