[PATCH 0/4] add missing of_node_puts

[PATCH 0/4] add missing of_node_puts

[Julia Lawall]

The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.

The patches for drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c and
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c contain some added of_node_puts for
which the need was identified manually.  Details are in the patch logs.

---

 drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c           |   25 +++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c  |    5 ++++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_rgb.c |    4 +++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c   |    1 +
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/4] drm/mediatek: add missing of_node_puts

[Julia Lawall]

The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):

// <smpl>
@@
local idexpression n;
expression e,e1;
identifier l;
@@

 for_each_child_of_node(e1,n) {
   ...
(
   of_node_put(n);
|
   e = n
|
+  of_node_put(n);
?  goto l;
)
   ...
 }
...
l: ... when != n
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
index 6422e99..b9205bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
@@ -522,12 +522,15 @@ static int mtk_drm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			comp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*comp), GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (!comp) {
 				ret = -ENOMEM;
+				of_node_put(node);
 				goto err_node;
 			}
 
 			ret = mtk_ddp_comp_init(dev, node, comp, comp_id, NULL);
-			if (ret)
+			if (ret) {
+				of_node_put(node);
 				goto err_node;
+			}
 
 			private->ddp_comp[comp_id] = comp;
 		}


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/4] drm/rockchip: add missing of_node_put

[Julia Lawall]

The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.

The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):

// <smpl>
@@
expression root,e;
local idexpression child;
iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
@@

 for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
   ... when != of_node_put(child)
       when != e = child
+  of_node_put(child);
?  break;
   ...
}
... when != child
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_rgb.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_rgb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_rgb.c
index 96ac145..37f9302 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_rgb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_rgb.c
@@ -113,8 +113,10 @@ struct rockchip_rgb *rockchip_rgb_init(struct device *dev,
 		child_count++;
 		ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(dev->of_node, 0, endpoint_id,
 						  &panel, &bridge);
-		if (!ret)
+		if (!ret) {
+			of_node_put(endpoint);
 			break;
+		}
 	}
 
 	of_node_put(port);


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/rockchip: add missing of_node_put

[Heiko Stuebner]

Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2019, 09:47:43 CET schrieb Julia Lawall:
> The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
> jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
>    ... when != of_node_put(child)
>        when != e = child
> +  of_node_put(child);
> ?  break;
>    ...
> }
> ... when != child
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

I've added a fixes+stable tag and applied it to drm-misc-fixes

Thanks for catching that
Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/rockchip: add missing of_node_put

[Daniel Vetter]

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 07:48:49PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2019, 09:47:43 CET schrieb Julia Lawall:
> > The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
> > jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> > 
> > The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> > 
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression root,e;
> > local idexpression child;
> > iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> > @@
> > 
> >  for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> >    ... when != of_node_put(child)
> >        when != e = child
> > +  of_node_put(child);
> > ?  break;
> >    ...
> > }
> > ... when != child
> > // </smpl>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> I've added a fixes+stable tag and applied it to drm-misc-fixes

All of them or just this one here? These cleanup patches have a high
chance of falling through cracks, so taking them all usually works out
better ...
-Daniel

> 
> Thanks for catching that
> Heiko
> 
> 

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/rockchip: add missing of_node_put

[Heiko Stuebner]

Am Montag, 14. Januar 2019, 11:05:56 CET schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 07:48:49PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 13. Januar 2019, 09:47:43 CET schrieb Julia Lawall:
> > > The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each iteration, so a
> > > jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> > > 
> > > The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows
> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> > > 
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression root,e;
> > > local idexpression child;
> > > iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> > > @@
> > > 
> > >  for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> > >    ... when != of_node_put(child)
> > >        when != e = child
> > > +  of_node_put(child);
> > > ?  break;
> > >    ...
> > > }
> > > ... when != child
> > > // </smpl>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> > 
> > I've added a fixes+stable tag and applied it to drm-misc-fixes
> 
> All of them or just this one here? These cleanup patches have a high
> chance of falling through cracks, so taking them all usually works out
> better ...

That is the only one I got, so right now I only applied this one in my inbox.
Weekend and such resulted in me not going looking for other ones.

Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/4] drm/sun4i: backend: add missing of_node_puts

[Julia Lawall]

The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each
iteration, so a jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.

Remote and port also have augmented reference counts, so drop them
on each iteration and at the end of the function, respectively.
Remote is only used for the address it contains, not for the
contents of that address, so the reference count can be dropped
immediately.

The semantic patch that fixes the first part of this problem is
as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):

// <smpl>
@@
expression root,e;
local idexpression child;
iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
@@

 for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
   ... when != of_node_put(child)
       when != e = child
+  of_node_put(child);
?  break;
   ...
}
... when != child
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
Not tested.

 drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
index 9e9255e..a021bab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
@@ -786,17 +786,18 @@ static struct sun4i_frontend *sun4i_backend_find_frontend(struct sun4i_drv *drv,
 		remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
 		if (!remote)
 			continue;
+		of_node_put(remote);
 
 		/* does this node match any registered engines? */
 		list_for_each_entry(frontend, &drv->frontend_list, list) {
 			if (remote == frontend->node) {
-				of_node_put(remote);
 				of_node_put(port);
+				of_node_put(ep);
 				return frontend;
 			}
 		}
 	}
-
+	of_node_put(port);
 	return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 }
 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/sun4i: backend: add missing of_node_puts

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1098 bytes --]

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 09:47:44AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The device node iterators perform an of_node_get on each
> iteration, so a jump out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> Remote and port also have augmented reference counts, so drop them
> on each iteration and at the end of the function, respectively.
> Remote is only used for the address it contains, not for the
> contents of that address, so the reference count can be dropped
> immediately.
> 
> The semantic patch that fixes the first part of this problem is
> as follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> iterator name for_each_child_of_node;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
>    ... when != of_node_put(child)
>        when != e = child
> +  of_node_put(child);
> ?  break;
>    ...
> }
> ... when != child
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

Applied, thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel