From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:48:21 +0200
Subject: ARM: s3c2410: Fix a typo in a comment line
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPeujGfUt6Sw-N9kBGSyZKvpqdGu8=zoT0pSzi64ioVqOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d2ae00c8-da57-9ffc-3692-67ed6daa95e0@users.sourceforge.net>
 <b93ca267-88d2-b68a-1570-dc8fc71f3888@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20171004181420.lctwaocrvg6rxokk@kozik-lap>
 <0f6ea076-2d41-103a-b1a1-40edc38e2daf@users.sourceforge.net>
 <CAJKOXPeujGfUt6Sw-N9kBGSyZKvpqdGu8=zoT0pSzi64ioVqOg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <33aa2c66-622a-0d36-47b2-554dc3592b70@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

>>> Thanks, applied, squashed and changed commit msg.
>>
>> Would it be more appropriate to use a commit subject like
>> ?ARM: s3c241x: Fix typos in two comments? (instead of
>> ?ARM: s3c2410: Fix typos in a comments?)?
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=6c7a7db2e4c25acf8bd8086797d39a51728139e0
> 
> Yes, it would but patch is already applied and I prefer to avoid
> rebasing unless really necessary.

I would appreciate also a corresponding correct commit message.
Is it interesting that this change attempt seems to have caused another unwanted typo?

Regards,
Markus