From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vladimir.murzin@arm.com (Vladimir Murzin) Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 09:27:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix __show_regs output timestamps In-Reply-To: <1493857488.22125.31.camel@perches.com> References: <61817479ac8c4c6c8be702d2e2136fddac1b1821.1493228290.git.joe@perches.com> <20170503192310.GD22219@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <1493840651.22125.24.camel@perches.com> <20170503213034.GF22219@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> <1493857488.22125.31.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <3401f323-a4fa-a636-e032-d033ad059646@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/05/17 01:24, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 22:30 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:44:11PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 20:23 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >>>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:39:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >>>>> Multiple line formats are not preferred as the second and >>>>> subsequent lines may not have timestamps. >>>>> >>>>> Lacking timestamps makes reading the output a bit difficult. >>>>> This also makes arm/arm64 output more similar. >>>>> >>>>> Previous: >>>>> >>>>> [ 1514.093231] pc : [] lr : [] psr: a00f0013 >>>>> sp : ecdd7e20 ip : 00000000 fp : ffffffff >>>>> >>>>> New: >>>>> >>>>> [ 1514.093231] pc : [] lr : [] psr: a00f0013 >>>>> [ 1514.105316] sp : ecdd7e20 ip : 00000000 fp : ffffffff >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches >>>> >>>> Hi Joe, >>>> >>>> Could you put this in my patch system please, I'm unlikely to remember to >>>> apply it otherwise if not already there (massive email backlog.) >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>> >>> Your patch system bounced my perfectly formatted patch >>> because your system wants totally unnecessary additional >>> information specific to your workflow. >>> >>> No thanks, I don't need the additional work just to >>> please your system and neither should anyone else. >> >> Don't expect me to remember to apply your patch then. I've got days of >> catch up, and I'm just not going to remember. Sorry. > > > > If your systems require special handling on the > part of patch submitters, you should document it > in the kernel tree. > > Better, someone else should find the time to apply > properly formatted patches. > Joe, I find this patch handy, so I've uploaded it into Russell's patch system on your behalf and it has been accepted as patch 8673/1. Cheers Vladimir > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >