From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FF5C6377D for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B125260FF2 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:54:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B125260FF2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lkmZ3lfGCUxx015eE8CylGXAHarMSdBIPr423UyJDms=; b=yq9PgpOLmHXHGa4L5wnRIJF/iq 8kLKhpjDuR47Ro5Jlolu3XpIL81japWdKKSx6qCfEINsR5Wbf9vBMssNlnjS7aKqD0d2BJfRXwFGH +UbEG2ZNIFYjxIa+Cs/iI5rBXSD+lYXfd2UOzuinfRhD6wjWjirKEx02IvciIIo2RONdNjJiHphtq TF959vCYJcMJ/hmyYNN3i9rPxpg1ND0gebmbtUVG5bEZ4YwycvgeKmxabwIQJPVwBvQP+BL/S2UNu jO68+binT4TmB9tEdPULUvKpOUAzr38f14OyxZ1aCNZ8kGEi01ne9a1EyVxQMx68pHwFgKEmWmApx 301NfXyg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6Z7M-001lNO-2q; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:52:05 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m6Z7C-001lLd-Jg for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:51:56 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E55113E; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 06:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.36.146] (unknown [10.57.36.146]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAB6B3F694; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 06:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_=e2=9d=8c_FAIL=3a_Test_report_for_kernel_5=2e13=2e0?= =?UTF-8?Q?-rc7_=28arm-next=2c_8ab9b1a9=29?= To: Veronika Kabatova , Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , ACPI Devel Maling List , Will Deacon , CKI Project , Mark Rutland , Memory Management , skt-results-master@redhat.com, Jeff Bastian , Jan Stancek , Linux ARM , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , lv.zheng@intel.com, Tony Luck , James Morse References: <20210629144415.GA28457@lpieralisi> <14ca6f72-9b0f-ebd7-9cf8-a5d6190c8e5d@arm.com> <20210629163543.GA12361@arm.com> <20210630103715.GA12089@lpieralisi> <20210630154923.GA16215@lpieralisi> <20210705161715.GA19877@lpieralisi> <20210716162617.GA1403@lpieralisi> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: <3422218f-73cc-ed3d-025a-ccf809075968@arm.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:51:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210722_065154_835158_0C824556 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.90 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2021-07-22 13:38, Veronika Kabatova wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 6:26 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:16:01PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>> On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 18:17, Lorenzo Pieralisi >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:18:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>> In current code, even if the BERT were mapped with acpi_os_map_iomem() >>>>>> this would change nothing since it's acpi_os_ioremap() that runs the >>>>>> rule (backed up by EFI memory map region info). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. So the fact that acpi_os_map_memory() is backed by >>>>> acpi_os_ioremap() is something we should fix. So they should both >>>>> consult the EFI memory map, but have different fallback defaults if >>>>> the region is not annotated correctly. >>>> >>>> Put together patch below even though I am not really satisfied, a tad >>>> intrusive and duplicate code in generic/arch backends, compile tested >>>> only; overall this IO vs memory mapping distinction is a bit too fuzzy >>>> for my taste - there is legacy unfortunately to consider though. >>>> >>> >>> I'd say that this does not look unreasonable at all. Is there any way >>> we could get this tested on actual hw? >> >> Sure, I was meant to follow-up and was caught up in something else, >> sorry. >> >> I will clean up the log, push it out in a branch on Monday, CKI >> should pick it up. I will also think about other possible testing >> options. >> > > Hi, > > thanks for the patience with the testing, the stress-ng test couldn't > deal with a new glibc version and had to be fixed and this week > has just been crazy. > > I managed to do 2 runs of the updated tree with the stress-ng test > and it didn't hit the problem. Given how unreliably it reproduces it > doesn't mean all that much. I still have one more run pending and > can submit more if needed. > > However, we ran into a panic with this tree on a completely > different machine: > > https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2152899/raw/main/snippetfile1.txt All the warnings from arch_setup_dma_ops() there are (unfortunately) pretty much legitimate for that platform, and should be gone again since rc2 with commit c1132702c71f. > The machine also hit a hardware error during LTP: > > https://gitlab.com/-/snippets/2152899/raw/main/snippetfile2.txt Hmm, if "access mode: secure" in that fault report implies that the firmnware itself has done something dodgy to raise an SError, I'm not sure there's much we can do about that... Robin. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel