From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@lechnology.com (David Lechner) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:27:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework In-Reply-To: References: <20180621073706.22812-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <9ec10627-49a5-07ad-8c9d-5ac873096cc0@ti.com> Message-ID: <345aed22-629a-abf6-df22-adee88a43df6@lechnology.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/02/2018 07:08 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori : >>> Hi Bartosz, >>> >>> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>>> >>>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order >>>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset >>>> framework. >>>> >>>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches >>>> merged. >>> >>> Series looks good to me. >>> >>> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1 >>> and #2 ? >>> >>> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the >>> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers. >>> >>> Open to other suggestions as well. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sekhar >> >> Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend? > > With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit > to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you > want to queue from your tree. > > Bartosz, given the number of moving pieces, I think its better to keep > 2/4 for v4.20 release - once all other other dependencies have been merged. I was thinking the same thing as well. I will pick it up in a clk-davinci-4.20 branch if that sounds OK.