[PATCH v6 14/19] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

[arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)]

On Monday 30 November 2015 23:21:41 Yury Norov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:34:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 22:57:52 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 00:16:54 Yury Norov wrote:
> > > > From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Add a separate syscall-table for ILP32, which dispatches either to native
> > > > LP64 system call implementation or to compat-syscalls, as appropriate.
> > > 
> > > I like it much better than the previous version, thanks for the rework!
> > 
> > Hi Yuri,
> > 
> > you must have missed my reply below. Are you still working on ilp32
> > or did you drop this thread because you got distracted with something
> > else?
> > 
> 
> I didn't miss it, and I continue with ILP32. I really appreciate your
> attention and time you spend on ILP32.
> 
> There's a tricky bug with signal stack, that Andreas also discovered.
> It makes almost all tests that use posix threads crash. I want to fix
> it and other bugs before next submission. 
> 
> I also update glibc to follow all recommendations, and I want to
> upload it together with kernel patches.

Ok. As a reviewer, I find long waits between submissions a bit annoying
because that means I have already forgotten everything I commented on
the previous time.

Could we try to get consensus on how the syscall ABI should look
before you start adapting glibc to another intermediate version?
I think that would also save you duplicate work, as it's always
possible that we misunderstand each other in the review. Also,
when someone asks you questions during a review, please reply to
those questions so we can get a common understanding of the facts
and document that in the mail archives.

	Arnd