From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: "Leonidas P. Papadakos" <papadakospan@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
william.wu@rock-chips.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add usb3 controller node for RK3328 SoCs
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:21:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3517438.8SjcAmMXWL@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552590510.1381.1@gmail.com>
Hi again :-)
Am Donnerstag, 14. März 2019, 20:08:30 CET schrieb Leonidas P. Papadakos:
> I must say with my testing, I never really have any disconnects. My
> drive generally works
It's not any disconnects, it is really when you unplug the device from
the root port that the
> Surely it's better that it works somewhat than not at all.
> Maybe we could include the patches and revert them later if a solution
> arrises?
>
> Or is that against the Linux way of doing things?
The main issue is
compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-dwc3", "rockchip,rk3399-dwc3";
because:
(1) On the devicetree-side you declare that they are compatible which may
or may not conflict with needed later changes
(2) On the kernel-driver-side with the current status the rk3328-dwc3
will get ignored and rk3399-dwc3 used to bind to the generic dt-dwc3
driver.
From looking at the Rockchip code in the vendor kernel we may very well
need a separate driver to handle the big issue which creates the issue
which driver will bind to the dt-node. It will be either the generic one
binding to the rk3399-dwc3 or the special one binding to rk3328-dwc3.
And sadly it will probably depend on which module gets loaded first.
And devicetrees are supposed to be backwards compatible so a newer
kernel should keep working with an old devicetree.
A possible way forward would be to introduce a separate compatible for
rk3328 (both in the binding doc and the generic dwc3 driver), so that
we get only a
compatible = "rockchip,rk3328-dwc3";
Which then even can move easily into a new driver if necessary without
causing issues for existing devicetrees.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 18:20 [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add usb3 controller node for RK3328 SoCs Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-03-14 19:02 ` Heiko Stübner
2019-03-14 19:05 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-03-14 19:08 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-03-14 19:21 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2019-03-14 19:24 ` Peter Geis
2019-03-14 19:52 ` Jonas Karlman
2019-03-14 20:07 ` Jonas Karlman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3517438.8SjcAmMXWL@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=papadakospan@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=william.wu@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).