From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Speeding up dma_unmap
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 13:23:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3526786.axKPs51069@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFSRaCRvx=+_fEYAr8OeWGHnnz+rOWjLzLcm+wZiEstbHwxAw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 27 January 2016 00:32:56 Jason Holt wrote:
>
> Failing that, I suppose a very dirty hack would be to
> data_cache_clean_and_invalidate if the only thing I cared about was
> getting data from my DMA peripheral as fast as possible. (I'm on
> AM335X and seeing no more than 200MB/s from device to CPU with
> dma_unmap_single, whereas the PRUs can write to main memory at
> 600MB/s.)
On your Cortex-A8, we could come up with a way to not invalidate
the cache at all on unmap, as the comment in __dma_page_dev_to_cpu()
says:
/* FIXME: non-speculating: not required */
/* in any case, don't bother invalidating if DMA to device */
if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
outer_inv_range(paddr, paddr + size);
dma_cache_maint_page(page, off, size, dir, dmac_unmap_area);
}
We already do a cache-invalidate operation on dma_map(), and the kernel
is not allowed to access the memory in the meantime. On CPU cores
that do speculative prefetching (Cortex-A9 and higher), we may end
up reading cache lines back in randomly on a speculative prefetch,
but as far as I can tell, the Cortex-A8 (or A5/A7) won't do that.
How does the performance change if you hack that file to simply not
do the invalidate?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-27 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-27 8:32 Speeding up dma_unmap Jason Holt
2016-01-27 11:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-01-27 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-01-27 16:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-27 18:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-28 10:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-28 11:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-28 11:49 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3526786.axKPs51069@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox