From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FD1C369DC for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:40:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=6xbZYXykMjgKMSpp52ywZEBlzjIEow9Ok6NjY0siqUc=; b=UflsCroBtQcgEhWbayP2UaA57E FeGLZopr7v/RePmV7ACXD9qE3scra1DXpyK3Cq9BD1hkHm6+rmHKuX2PtNXmdB7tEKcayFmLuTW0+ o0Uk/1B6FGyD3dVImfSxJVERnWnkq1XG8l5rq3BOEFf3J73CnGMP2MyLMDLczDbV4Te30vCCdCU9I M194ABS9C9Y88kmZ4ok9nnGnwjEB11EFLB57cdgWRUW9hhj6eFZdIdAZc7tCPVEuruJL2u9WekQ8W XHj4TJW1N58c/X0MG8Onsfvpko9jt/tlCpjGKWriyCCrmnA8ljhEj52JIJxjGsn0uCBN/Vn8ZcJfL r4GXnK5g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u7e5Q-0000000BIQW-2M2O; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:40:40 +0000 Received: from m16.mail.163.com ([220.197.31.3]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u7ast-0000000AnAA-308k; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 14:15:33 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From: Content-Type; bh=6xbZYXykMjgKMSpp52ywZEBlzjIEow9Ok6NjY0siqUc=; b=OhudICscJ21Kt98vX6rUiv4cDB7SwN1mK2jKC53EgKi7bz9iuBd6o/OE+zMLPn h22rs/khVJeHuPHZ0OA+edvEA6E1n/cPPN9+Y3cU6bJa/Yn28bnAYQPf0J8DGPQe Q3WkU7dElgsQe6x4t39U2vpOY5z5mL0muVjmEway1Grho= Received: from [192.168.71.89] (unknown []) by gzsmtp2 (Coremail) with SMTP id PSgvCgDHnCTi9QhoY7rzBQ--.27617S2; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:14:59 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <352e40a0-65e2-499f-a7dd-904a4a7b19da@163.com> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:14:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PCI: dw-rockchip: Reorganize register and bitfield definitions To: Niklas Cassel Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, heiko@sntech.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org References: <20250423105415.305556-1-18255117159@163.com> <20250423105415.305556-3-18255117159@163.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: PSgvCgDHnCTi9QhoY7rzBQ--.27617S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW3Wr1xGry5KryDKF4ktr1xAFb_yoWxur1fp3 4DAFyIyr45tay7Z3s5uFs8XFWIqrnxKFWUWrsagrWUZ3WkAw48Gw1j9FyrWFy3Jr4kCrWf uwn8C34SgFWakrDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UBq2_UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [124.79.128.52] X-CM-SenderInfo: rpryjkyvrrlimvzbiqqrwthudrp/xtbBDxg4o2gI7X36cgAAs0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250423_071532_261106_59E61C8D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.49 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2025/4/23 21:43, Niklas Cassel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 06:54:14PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote: >> Register definitions were scattered with ambiguous names (e.g., >> PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED in PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC) and lacked >> hierarchical grouping. Magic values for bit operations reduced code >> clarity. >> >> Group registers and their associated bitfields logically. This improves >> maintainability and aligns the code with hardware documentation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com> >> --- >> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 71 ++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c >> index fd5827bbfae3..6cf75160fb1c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c >> @@ -34,30 +34,49 @@ >> >> #define to_rockchip_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev) >> >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40) >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0) >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc) >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8) >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x04 >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC 0x10 >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC 0x24 >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_POWER 0x2c >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN 0x34 >> -#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3) >> -#define PME_TURN_OFF (BIT(4) | BIT(20)) >> -#define PME_TO_ACK (BIT(9) | BIT(25)) >> -#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16) >> -#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17) >> -#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP) >> -#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1) >> -#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2) >> -#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0 >> +/* General Control Register */ >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON 0x0 >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40) >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_EP_MODE HIWORD_UPDATE(0xf0, 0x0) >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc) >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM HIWORD_UPDATE(0x0c, 0x8) >> + >> +/* Interrupt Status Register Related to Message Reception */ >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX 0x4 >> + >> +/* Interrupt Status Register Related to Legacy Interrupt */ >> #define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8 >> + >> +/* Interrupt Status Register Related to Miscellaneous Operation */ > > double spaces, other comments just have one space. > Hi Niklas, Thank you very much for your reply. Will change. > >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MISC 0x10 >> +#define PCIE_RDLH_LINK_UP_CHGED BIT(1) >> +#define PCIE_LINK_REQ_RST_NOT_INT BIT(2) >> + >> +/* Interrupt Mask Register Related to Legacy Interrupt */ >> #define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c >> + >> +/* Interrupt Mask Register Related to Miscellaneous Operation */ >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_MISC 0x24 >> + >> +/* Power Management Control Register */ >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_POWER_CON 0x2c >> +#define PME_READY_ENTER_L23 BIT(3) >> + >> +/* Message Generation Control Register */ > > double spaces, other comments just have one space. > Will change. > >> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON 0x34 >> +#define PME_TURN_OFF HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(4)) >> +#define PME_TO_ACK HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(BIT(9)) >> + >> +/* Hot Reset Control Register */ >> #define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL 0x180 >> +#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4) >> + >> +/* LTSSM Status Register */ >> #define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS 0x300 >> -#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4) >> -#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) >> +#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP BIT(16) >> +#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP BIT(17) >> +#define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP) >> +#define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) >> >> struct rockchip_pcie { >> struct dw_pcie pci; >> @@ -176,13 +195,13 @@ static u32 rockchip_pcie_get_pure_ltssm(struct dw_pcie *pci) >> static void rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip) >> { >> rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM, >> - PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL); >> + PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON); >> } >> >> static void rockchip_pcie_disable_ltssm(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip) >> { >> rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_DISABLE_LTSSM, >> - PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL); >> + PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON); >> } >> >> static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) >> @@ -274,8 +293,8 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_pme_turn_off(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp) >> u32 status; >> >> /* 1. Broadcast PME_Turn_Off Message, bit 4 self-clear once done */ >> - rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PME_TURN_OFF, PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN); >> - ret = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN, >> + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PME_TURN_OFF, PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON); >> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON, >> status, !(status & BIT(4)), PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US / 10, >> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US); >> if (ret) { >> @@ -294,7 +313,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_pme_turn_off(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp) >> >> /* 3. Clear PME_TO_Ack and Wait for ready to enter L23 message */ >> rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PME_TO_ACK, PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_MSG_RX); >> - ret = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CLIENT_POWER, >> + ret = readl_poll_timeout(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_CLIENT_POWER_CON, >> status, status & PME_READY_ENTER_L23, >> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US / 10, >> PCIE_PME_TO_L2_TIMEOUT_US); >> @@ -552,7 +571,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_ltssm_enable_control_mode(struct rockchip_pcie *rockch >> val = HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE); >> rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL); >> >> - rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, mode, PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL); >> + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, mode, PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON); > > I can see why you renamed PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL to PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON > (to match PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON). > > But now we have PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON and > PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL. > > _CTRL seems like a more common shortening. How about renaming all three to > end with _CTRL ? I saw that TRM is named like this. PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_MSG_GEN_CON / PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL Shall we take TRM as the standard or your suggestion? Best regards, Hans