From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?=)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks
In-Reply-To: <20150811223409.GN2839@codeaurora.org>
References: <1429735986-18592-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de>
 <20150730100908.GI2564@lukather> <20150811223409.GN2839@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <3547940.Og2cC25c4G@diego>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Am Dienstag, 11. August 2015, 15:34:09 schrieb Stephen Boyd:
> On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > > did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
> > > 
> > > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> > > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
> > 
> > To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
> > any news since that mail.
> > 
> > I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
> > CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
> > situation worse for the time being).
> 
> Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff
> to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling
> clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first
> patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan
> tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we
> can merge the defer part.

great :-)

For the defer-part you came up with a better solution than mine anyway, if I 
remember correctly.