From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix deadlock possibility in cpuclk
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:52:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <355359386.nxMIlHNuqO@phil> (raw)
Lockdep reported a possible deadlock between the cpuclk lock and for example
the i2c driver.
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(clk_lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&(&i2c->lock)->rlock);
lock(clk_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&(&i2c->lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
The generic clock-types of the core ccf already use spin_lock_irqsave when
touching clock registers, so do the same for the cpuclk.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
index 75c8c45..3ecdf7d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
@@ -124,10 +124,11 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
{
const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data *reg_data = cpuclk->reg_data;
unsigned long alt_prate, alt_div;
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
alt_prate = clk_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent);
- spin_lock(cpuclk->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(cpuclk->lock, flags);
/*
* If the old parent clock speed is less than the clock speed
@@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core_reg);
}
- spin_unlock(cpuclk->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpuclk->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
{
const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data *reg_data = cpuclk->reg_data;
const struct rockchip_cpuclk_rate_table *rate;
+ unsigned long flags = 0;
rate = rockchip_get_cpuclk_settings(cpuclk, ndata->new_rate);
if (!rate) {
@@ -181,7 +183,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
return -EINVAL;
}
- spin_lock(cpuclk->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(cpuclk->lock, flags);
if (ndata->old_rate < ndata->new_rate)
rockchip_cpuclk_set_dividers(cpuclk, rate);
@@ -201,7 +203,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
if (ndata->old_rate > ndata->new_rate)
rockchip_cpuclk_set_dividers(cpuclk, rate);
- spin_unlock(cpuclk->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpuclk->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.1.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-16 16:52 Heiko Stübner [this message]
2015-01-16 17:11 ` [PATCH] clk: rockchip: fix deadlock possibility in cpuclk Doug Anderson
2015-01-17 19:23 ` Mike Turquette
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=355359386.nxMIlHNuqO@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox