From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0ACC4338F for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E167C610FC for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 12:34:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org E167C610FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=R2XVG4AJlyFwPlywwxwqUfEGraDnTwWa/rBPeRxHOEg=; b=FeIQJmL27EceELH2Issys8s2GD DQeGjuhi2/BWEb5B0CZBMhj7X4WpBtEnqlwgpYMbaTHkZr4FS9S+mBtw0gboUx8TRbLNKbkvJp7QN ETkLZSs5Jk3AUwKA8q1VEQO/lgyrHXyysoJUQybbIj39NhdOENiczEVNuserN/JeWekui/BNXWIEG Je0xyRo4x/C23IJ9R2svNAlVKeig/s+79VoS9SADwBmEqZw24VekRQyR3Lebm1DDJlv2NaskV8UM0 WbpIz3199xZzbT6RQkrNTEAWh2hV5W1MHoMZjYjDcnKF0tI1OJHkkKah7at5cR+iCHvRkF7SvC004 5P6MvIsA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mBcYG-009V4C-Cn; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 12:32:44 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mBcYC-009V3X-Go for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 12:32:42 +0000 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 175CWaH7092873; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:32:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1628166756; bh=XUSqxi7FM17TLwc2Nhza1mKB2e3Rf7quG1dYWp2LQ6g=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hx+jDxOVr7AEZNV4zwp6slrUOBmUiK6tB3QUUNpttazCoWtODkRQY7ec4p7213T2c CND0JDZoA9LsABzOy/FzFXGV1Z1PP0H5WJ6FwulUw6M+U1dggHaKxBU0ih8l0zW4td I48Xi0wB9eLHfux9pKz78KAa33QMZoUvrS2eWJ0U= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 175CWaSg002800 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:32:36 -0500 Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:32:36 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:32:36 -0500 Received: from [10.250.232.51] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 175CWVh9004024; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 07:32:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] CAN: Add support for CAN in AM65,J721e and AM64 To: Nishanth Menon , Jan Kiszka CC: , , , Tero Kristo , Rob Herring , Marc Kleine-Budde , Lokesh Vutla , Faiz Abbas References: <20210726101012.26983-1-a-govindraju@ti.com> <20210802124509.z23lfg7xxkqaakbo@truce> From: Aswath Govindraju Message-ID: <36011cee-f617-02ed-7446-c297ba65e6bf@ti.com> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 18:02:31 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210802124509.z23lfg7xxkqaakbo@truce> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210805_053240_701247_E4921E2A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On 02/08/21 6:15 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 15:40-20210726, Aswath Govindraju wrote: >> The following series of patches add support for CAN in SoC's AM65, J721e >> and AM64. >> >> This patch series is dependent on [1] and [2] and I have requested for an >> immutable tag from the Marc Kleine-Budde(maintainer of net tree). >> >> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1423048/ >> [2] - https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-can/msg08108.html >> >> changes since v1 - >> - changed the message ram configuration to use the maximum value >> in each field, for better performance. >> >> Aswath Govindraju (3): >> arm64: dts: ti: am654-base-board: Disable mcan nodes >> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add support for MCAN >> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm/sk: Add support for main domain mcan >> nodes in EVM and disable them on SK >> >> Faiz Abbas (3): >> arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65-mcu: Add Support for MCAN >> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e: Add support for MCAN nodes >> arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-common-proc-board: Add support for mcu_mcan >> nodes > > I noticed in my checkup: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/zSk39M943N/ > warnings with dtbs_check, I think the bindings need a little more help > here (please also notice the iot platform warnings getting introduced). > Jan, Can you please point me to the schematics for iot platform? Also, is CAN subsystem brought out on the iot platform boards? > Since we are still working on the bindings[1], lets clean that up > before we consider the dts addition. I suspect we need to cook this > more towards the next cycle. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1470806/ > Nishanth, Sorry for not taking of this earlier. I'll try to get everything ready for next release. Thanks, Aswath _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel