From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:00:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] ARM: pxa: Fix out of vmalloc space bug In-Reply-To: References: <1397066897-31826-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <20140710121010.GA1990@arch.cereza> Message-ID: <3632586.xKfZNAEmjS@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Olof, On Thursday 10 July 2014 09:56:32 Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:10 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > On 10 Apr 08:31 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Wednesday 09 April 2014 15:05:26 Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 9 Apr 2014, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> (Resending due to a typo in an e-mail address that caused LAKML to > >>>>> reject the mails. Sorry about the noise.) > >>>>> > >>>>> This patch set reworks Ezequiel Garcia's previous fix [1] of an out > >>>>> of vmalloc space bug on PXA2[57]x platforms caused by an attempt to > >>>>> map the start of physical uncached outside of the vmalloc space. > >>>>> > >>>>> This first three patches perform a couple of cleanups, and the last > >>>>> patch fixes the problem. I've decided to map the memory at address > >>>>> 0xfe000000 to minimize changes to the code, but this causes a bit > >>>>> of fragmentation of vmalloc space. I could map it to the very end > >>>>> of vmalloc space (0xfef00000) instead if preferred, which would > >>>>> involve replacing a mov by an ldr in > >>>>> pxa2[57]x_finish_suspend and pm_enter_standby_start. > >>>>> > >>>>> I've tested the patch set on a PXA270-based system. > >>>> > >>>> For those patches: > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre > >>> > >>> Thank you. > >>> > >>> MAINTAINERS lists three maintainers for the PXA architecture, and two > >>> git trees that seem to be either dead or even deleted. Who picks up > >>> patches for PXA ? Should I send a pull request ? > >> > >> If no one else answers, then just send a pull request to the ARM-SOC > >> team (arm at kernel.org) and CC the linux-arm-kernel mailing list. > > > > What ever happened to this? > > Nothing, from the looks of it. I can apply them directly unless someone > objects. > > Laurent, care to rebase and send a fresh copy? cc arm at kernel.org. Sure. Done. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart