From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:23:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx: remove unused device definitions In-Reply-To: <7e077d23-eec1-6a6a-9318-84a5543d684d@pengutronix.de> References: <20161216090533.2195228-1-arnd@arndb.de> <7e077d23-eec1-6a6a-9318-84a5543d684d@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <3673316.UJiiIZbYgE@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday, December 16, 2016 10:10:49 AM CET Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 12/16/2016 10:05 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I stumbled over these during build testing, they are evidently > > not referenced anywhere any more. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c | 9 --------- > > arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 10 ---------- > > 2 files changed, 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c > > index 55d61eaf63c6..8a1a2fc4ce10 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/devices/platform-flexcan.c > > @@ -19,15 +19,6 @@ > > #define imx_flexcan_data_entry(soc, _id, _hwid, _size) \ > > [_id] = imx_flexcan_data_entry_single(soc, _id, _hwid, _size) > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX25 > > -const struct imx_flexcan_data imx25_flexcan_data[] __initconst = { > > -#define imx25_flexcan_data_entry(_id, _hwid) \ > > - imx_flexcan_data_entry(MX25, _id, _hwid, SZ_16K) > > - imx25_flexcan_data_entry(0, 1), > > - imx25_flexcan_data_entry(1, 2), > > -}; > > -#endif /* ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX25 */ > > - > > #ifdef CONFIG_SOC_IMX35 > > const struct imx_flexcan_data imx35_flexcan_data[] __initconst = { > > #define imx35_flexcan_data_entry(_id, _hwid) \ > > What about the imx35 variant? > It's used from here: arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm043.c: imx35_add_flexcan1(); Arnd