[PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks

[gabriel.fernandez@st.com (Gabriel Fernandez)]

Hi Stephen,


On 10/19/2016 10:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>>
>> On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez at st.com wrote:
>>>> Gabriel Fernandez (6):
>>>>    clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
>>>>    ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
>>>>    arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
>>>>    clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
>>>>    clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
>>>>    ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
>>> Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for
>>> existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers
>>> instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has
>>> intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused.
>>>
>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>
>> Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there
>> is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into
>> clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2.
> Let's break the dependency by making the required property
> optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands
> right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the
> second patch lands which is not great.
>
>> You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue.
>>
>>
> I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches
> the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch
> series. Thanks.
Ok

Many Thanks.