From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/7] xen/arm: introduce xen_read_wallclock
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:35:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3711503.LuojCRibK3@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447156675-7418-6-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 11:57:54 Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> +static void xen_read_wallclock(struct timespec64 *ts)
> +{
> + u32 version;
> + u64 delta;
> + struct timespec64 now;
> + struct shared_info *s = HYPERVISOR_shared_info;
> + struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall_clock = &(s->wc);
> +
> + /* get wallclock at system boot */
> + do {
> + version = wall_clock->version;
> + rmb(); /* fetch version before time */
> + now.tv_sec = ((uint64_t)wall_clock->sec_hi << 32) | wall_clock->sec;
> + now.tv_nsec = wall_clock->nsec;
> + rmb(); /* fetch time before checking version */
> + } while ((wall_clock->version & 1) || (version != wall_clock->version));
> +
> + delta = arch_timer_read_counter() * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + do_div(delta, arch_timer_get_rate()); /* time since system boot */
> + delta += now.tv_sec * (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC + now.tv_nsec;
> +
> + now.tv_nsec = do_div(delta, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + now.tv_sec = delta;
> +
> + set_normalized_timespec64(ts, now.tv_sec, now.tv_nsec);
> +
> +}
Instead of the two do_div(), I would do the entire calculation in
terms of nanoseconds and then call ns_to_timespec64() in the end
instead of set_normalized_timespec64(). That is just an optimization
though, your version looks correct as well.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-10 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 11:56 [PATCH v2 0/7] Xen wallclock on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] timekeeping: introduce __current_kernel_time64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-10 14:34 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 15:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 15:26 ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-10 15:41 ` John Stultz
2015-11-10 15:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-11-11 11:51 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-11 13:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] xen: rename dom0_op to platform_op Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] xen/arm: introduce HYPERVISOR_platform_op on arm and arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] xen: introduce XENPF_settime64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 14:43 ` Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: extend pvclock_wall_clock with sec_hi Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] xen/arm: introduce xen_read_wallclock Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-10 11:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] xen/arm: set the system time in Xen via the XENPF_settime64 hypercall Stefano Stabellini
2015-11-10 12:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-10 15:58 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3711503.LuojCRibK3@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox