From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer: Use {readl|writel}_relaxed
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:42:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3713227.4t0cg6qNF9@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447417883-7881-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
On Friday 13 November 2015 20:31:23 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c
> index c76c750..04282ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer.c
> @@ -51,13 +51,13 @@ clocksource_to_dw_apb_clocksource(struct clocksource *cs)
>
> static unsigned long apbt_readl(struct dw_apb_timer *timer, unsigned long offs)
> {
> - return readl(timer->base + offs);
> + return readl_relaxed(timer->base + offs);
> }
>
> static void apbt_writel(struct dw_apb_timer *timer, unsigned long val,
> unsigned long offs)
> {
> - writel(val, timer->base + offs);
> + writel_relaxed(val, timer->base + offs);
> }
>
>
As with the other patch, I think it would be nicer to only change the
functions that benefit from the change, to make it easier to prove
that the conversion is correct. You could introduce apbt_readl_releaxed()
etc functions and call them from __apbt_read_clocksource()
and apbt_next_event().
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-13 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-13 12:31 [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/dw_apb_timer: Use {readl|writel}_relaxed Jisheng Zhang
2015-11-13 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-13 12:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-11-13 13:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3713227.4t0cg6qNF9@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox