From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 4/7] iommu: provide helper function to configure an IOMMU for an of master
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 16:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3729116.F0gWrQGFZl@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140901082939.GC24430@ulmo>
On Monday 01 September 2014 10:29:40 Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> I think this could use a bit more formalization. As I said in another
> reply earlier, there's very little standardization in the IOMMU API.
> That certainly gives us a lot of flexibility but it also has the
> downside that it's difficult to handle these abstractions in the core,
> which is really what the core is all about, isn't it?
>
> One method that worked really well for this in the past for other
> subsystems is to allow drivers to specify an .of_xlate() function that
> takes the controller device and a struct of_phandle_args. It is that
> function's responsibility to take the information in an of_phandle_args
> structure and use that to create some subsystem specific handle that
> represents this information in a way that it can readily be used.
Yes, good idea.
> So I think it would really be helpful if IOMMU gained support for
> something similar. We could create a struct iommu to represent an
> instance of an IOMMU. IOMMU drivers can embed this structure and add
> device-specific fields that they need. That way we can easily pass
> around instances and upcast in the driver in a type-safe way.
Right.
> At the same time, a struct iommu_master could provide the basis to
> represent a single master interface on an IOMMU. Drivers can again embed
> that in driver-specific structures with additional fields required for
> the particular IOMMU implementation. .of_xlate() could return such an
> IOMMU master for the core to use.
I'm not convinced it's necessary. Could this just be a 'struct device'
instead of 'struct iommu_master'?
> With such structures in place we should be able to eliminate many of the
> loops in IOMMU drivers that serve no other purpose than to find the
> master context from a struct device * and some parameters. It will also
> allow us to keep a central registry of IOMMUs and masters rather than
> duplicating that in every driver.
Yes, we should be able to identify an iommu context in a generic way,
but why do you want to break it down to individual masters within
one context?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-01 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-29 15:54 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Introduce automatic DMA configuration for IOMMU masters Will Deacon
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] iommu: provide early initialisation hook for IOMMU drivers Will Deacon
2014-09-01 7:52 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-01 14:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-01 16:36 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 6:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-09-02 14:47 ` Varun Sethi
2014-09-02 15:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] dma-mapping: replace set_arch_dma_coherent_ops with arch_setup_dma_ops Will Deacon
2014-09-01 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-01 16:20 ` Will Deacon
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] iommu: add new iommu_ops callback for adding a device with a set of IDs Will Deacon
2014-09-01 8:13 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-01 14:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-01 16:34 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-01 17:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] iommu: provide helper function to configure an IOMMU for an of master Will Deacon
2014-09-01 8:29 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-01 14:46 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-09-01 16:40 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-01 20:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 10:03 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 12:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 13:05 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 20:59 ` jroedel at suse.de
2014-09-03 9:45 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 15:03 ` Varun Sethi
2014-09-02 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 10:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-09-02 10:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-09-02 11:03 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 19:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-09-02 14:55 ` Varun Sethi
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] dma-mapping: detect and configure IOMMU in of_dma_configure Will Deacon
2014-09-01 14:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] arm: call iommu_init before of_platform_populate Will Deacon
2014-08-29 15:54 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] arm: dma-mapping: plumb our iommu mapping ops into arch_setup_dma_ops Will Deacon
2014-09-02 6:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] Introduce automatic DMA configuration for IOMMU masters Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-02 8:31 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 8:48 ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-02 8:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 10:42 ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-02 10:57 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-02 12:24 ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-02 12:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 21:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-09-02 12:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 12:30 ` Marek Szyprowski
2014-09-02 12:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02 13:11 ` Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3729116.F0gWrQGFZl@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox