From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: amit.kucheria@canonical.com (Amit Kucheria) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:33:16 -0800 Subject: [PATCHv2 08/11] fec: fix uninitialized rx buffer usage In-Reply-To: References: <9fa7a3c70c46a1f776c6520051481cff6525ef02.1265173480.git.amit.kucheria@canonical.com> <240f12ca87d7666f31263aabc620a9ec197cd8ff.1265173480.git.amit.kucheria@canonical.com> <752ae69adb57d4f73fa011ba380cea1b927b9c8b.1265173480.git.amit.kucheria@canonical.com> Message-ID: <37786d4b1002031033s15d0b24et82c3f0e45112ae65@mail.gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Amit Kucheria > wrote: >> From: Rob Herring >> >> The fec driver was enabling receive buffer descriptor without allocating >> the buffers. Make sure the buffer descriptors are initialized to not >> start receiving packets. >> >> Open also calls fec_restart after the rx buffers are allocated. With the code >> in fec_restart, it zeroes out the buffer descriptors that have just been >> setup. > > fec related patches 8 & 9 look okay to me. > > g. > > -- > Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. > Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. Can I take that as an Acked-by?