From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C5D8C88E53 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=va4hEoVVnZxhPHxpMSlDZN7m5s0titWsto8y7/v9Cjw=; b=tZgnY5EDwnSEPIhZLWaWMi0fG2 lYap7IACbMvwy/yVocKN5mdXsX41NTrWft+C9l4YQTZqsdEMqpE2VaqDpoSNR7qB1Zp+exUjONRFQ B7g/XAMrVOZzUrglmuorFZf7RDWwcHDfMT6FbeHoVRC09WbyviaHM4XIvvR4xqZsQrEzoWHFKq2jc /nBsllVuUldMqq2lP1fm/H+RAa0NIV5aSSJIvSwoZQlEhQw8fR1uG0eKvUq16C3cNl0pdSNIPJ2E8 96dG9PbIOYQeK4napMPxsixsHotzGUmY7+Q2kBxDhrjfJc1XN1ar+CZmFhBWIkBfpmhmhErQ5lEKL z8EGjxUQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x542A-0000000HCyD-0itG; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:23:26 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x5427-0000000HCwv-2qsO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 16:23:25 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABE32BC3; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.212.8] (e134344.arm.com [10.2.212.8]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19FF43F7B4; Fri, 11 Sep 2026 09:23:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1789143802; bh=cF2rHoPHNtjoruLUsmFFA7ElnvzZvWiENPhyyCo2U5s=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=pw9zKi+/2eQ2NOfn6/sMAztLIfuDRe4HCfj8AQSTTYeoXZnCahELPnENpWUd4PbfF fkzHla2qIVd0I3QS6KXvmciOV4HOpiZA6ExqiaqfYeD9NW784K5Pgeoph1Owv44hGR zWnCmmi9zr6zlN8gyvxB8GbrjujNUqc6Lv8qWqhg= Message-ID: <37db65c7-db4a-4085-a586-62931d73299f@arm.com> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:23:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/14] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for interrupt control To: Andre Przywara , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , James Morse , Reinette Chatre , Fenghua Yu Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Srivathsa L Rao , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , Trilok Soni , Srinivas Ramana , Niyas Sait , Lee Trager , Ritwick Sharma , Gavin Shan , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260911112835.714162-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20260911112835.714162-9-andre.przywara@arm.com> <89a13b60-a1fe-442f-ab0d-b0d37a118ad1@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Ben Horgan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260911_092323_813660_5FE2D638 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.30 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andre, On 11/09/2026 17:19, Andre Przywara wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On 9/11/26 16:26, Ben Horgan wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> On 11/09/2026 12:28, Andre Przywara wrote: >>> Allow the functions dealing with interrupt registration and enablement >>> to check for and return errors, and propagate MSC read and write errors >>> from the lower level up. >>> This does not cover the IRQ handler yet, as this needs some more >>> attention. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara >>> Reviewed-by: Srivathsa L Rao >> >> Commenting here as this is the last error propagation patch. I think we need a clean boundary for >> the error propagation. As you said a while back I think we can propagate error for all non-static >> functions from mpam_devices.c and the callers can discard the errors if appropriate. For instance, >> mpam_reset_class_locked() should propagate any error. > > So I checked all non-static functions in mpam_devices.c: most either don't deal with MSCs at all, or > already propagate errors. > The two outliers are mpam_disable(), which must be "void", due to it being called via DECLARE_WORK, > and mpam_reset_class_locked(), as you write above. The latter is a bit sad, because the caller is > void, so any errors would be discarded there anyway, but for the sake of completeness we should > indeed propagate here. > > And I guess it doesn't make sense to continue the vMSC or RIS list iterations after detecting the > first error, but we just bail out immediately? Because any error would trigger mpam_disable() anyway? Yeah, bailing early makes sense to me. Thanks, Ben > > Cheers, > Andre > > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ben >> >>> --- >>>   drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- >>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c >>> index 558efab75f911..eb26c25b9f970 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c >>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c >>> @@ -1105,7 +1105,9 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc) >>>       } >>>         /* Clear any stale errors */ >>> -    mpam_msc_clear_esr(msc); >>> +    ret = mpam_msc_clear_esr(msc); >>> +    if (ret) >>> +        return ret; >>>         spin_lock(&partid_max_lock); >>>       mpam_partid_max = min(mpam_partid_max, msc->partid_max); >>> @@ -2668,9 +2670,7 @@ static int mpam_enable_msc_ecr(void *_msc) >>>   { >>>       struct mpam_msc *msc = _msc; >>>   -    __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, MPAMF_ECR_INTEN); >>> - >>> -    return 0; >>> +    return __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, MPAMF_ECR_INTEN); >>>   } >>>     /* This can run in mpam_disable(), and the interrupt handler on the same CPU */ >>> @@ -2678,9 +2678,7 @@ static int mpam_disable_msc_ecr(void *_msc) >>>   { >>>       struct mpam_msc *msc = _msc; >>>   -    __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, 0); >>> - >>> -    return 0; >>> +    return __mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ECR, 0); >>>   } >>>     static irqreturn_t __mpam_irq_handler(int irq, struct mpam_msc *msc) >>> @@ -2777,11 +2775,13 @@ static int mpam_register_irqs(void) >>>                   return err; >>>           } >>>   -        mutex_lock(&msc->error_irq_lock); >>> -        msc->error_irq_req = true; >>> -        mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_enable_msc_ecr, msc); >>> -        msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = true; >>> -        mutex_unlock(&msc->error_irq_lock); >>> +        scoped_guard(mutex, &msc->error_irq_lock) { >>> +            msc->error_irq_req = true; >>> +            err = mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_enable_msc_ecr, msc); >>> +            if (err) >>> +                return err; >>> +            msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = true; >>> +        } >>>       } >>>         return 0; >>> @@ -2800,10 +2800,10 @@ static void mpam_unregister_irqs(void) >>>           if (irq <= 0) >>>               continue; >>>   -        mutex_lock(&msc->error_irq_lock); >>> +        guard(mutex)(&msc->error_irq_lock); >>>           if (msc->error_irq_hw_enabled) { >>> -            mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_disable_msc_ecr, msc); >>> -            msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = false; >>> +            if (!mpam_touch_msc(msc, mpam_disable_msc_ecr, msc)) >>> +                msc->error_irq_hw_enabled = false; >>>           } >>>             if (msc->error_irq_req) { >>> @@ -2815,7 +2815,6 @@ static void mpam_unregister_irqs(void) >>>               } >>>               msc->error_irq_req = false; >>>           } >>> -        mutex_unlock(&msc->error_irq_lock); >>>       } >>>   } >>>   >> >