From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com (Quentin Schulz)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:55:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with late_initcall
In-Reply-To: <20160726094858.3aa96e18@free-electrons.com>
References: <1469519027-11387-1-git-send-email-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
 <1469519027-11387-2-git-send-email-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
 <20160726094858.3aa96e18@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <37ffd544-5f83-3a4e-3db1-b774684d5fe8@free-electrons.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

On 26/07/2016 09:48, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:43:44 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> 
>> -module_platform_driver(iio_hwmon_driver);
>> +static struct platform_driver * const drivers[] = {
>> +	&iio_hwmon_driver,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init iio_hwmon_late_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return platform_register_drivers(drivers, ARRAY_SIZE(drivers));
> 
> Why not platform_register_driver() ?
> 
> This would avoid the need to declare an array with just one entry.

Actually, it is named platform_driver_register() as you just showed me
and that's the reason I didn't find it under platform_register_driver().

Thanks!

Quentin