[PATCH 0/6] Samsung watchdog support clean-up

Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13T19:11:03Z

Hi Kukjin,

On Monday 10 of June 2013 19:00:57 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > Hi Kukjin,
> >
> > On Tuesday 04 of June 2013 18:37:54 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > Hi Sylwester, Kukjin,
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > > On Saturday 01 of June 2013 10:16:52 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> > > > > Hi Tomasz,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 05/19/2013 12:37 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > > > > This series is aiming at cleaning up a bit watchdog support on
> > > > > > Samsung
> > > > > > SoCs. The patches tweak a bit all the watchdog handling code
> > > > > > here and
> > > > > > there, with the goal of making it DT- and
> > > > > > multiplatform-friendly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > See particular patches for more detailed descriptions.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On S3C6410-based Tiny6410 board (Mini6410-compatible):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tested-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > I've tested this series on a s3c2440 based board. The system
> > > > > restart
> > > > > works fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > Thank you Sylwester for testing this series.
> > >
> > > Thanks again :-)
> > >
> > > > Kukjin, since it has been already tested on s3c24xx and s3c64xx
> > > > and nobody seems to care about s5p64x0 and s5pc100 (although I
> > > > don't see a reason why these patches should break them), could we
> > > > have this series applied?> >
> > > OK, let me test this series on the smdk64x0 then, will apply.
> > >
> > > If any problems, let you know.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your gentle reminder.
> >
> > Thank you for handling this. I have a lot of patches for S3C64xx
> > depending on this series queued in my private tree and it would be
> > really nice if I could finally get them merged for 3.11.
>
> Applied, thanks.

Seems like this series got lost in action, as I don't see it in your tree.
Is there any problem with it?

Best regards,
Tomasz