From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:09:14 +0200
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: at91: remove no-MMU at91x40 support
In-Reply-To: <5422DD2F.4090308@atmel.com>
References: <1411568281-3924-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
 <3700375.DRR5iB2NGi@wuerfel> <5422DD2F.4090308@atmel.com>
Message-ID: <3874734.x93Q9kHIES@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wednesday 24 September 2014 17:03:11 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > I think these can be simplified further: AT91_SAM9G45_RESET and
> > AT91_SAM9_ALT_RESET can just go away and the files put into
> > obj-y.
> 
> Yes, I had the same idea before realizing that these two directives will
> move away in a patch already sent for 3.18. So, as this material is
> probably 3.19-ish, I kept them as they are and keep in mind to remove
> them when I merge them with 3.18-rc1...

Ok.

> > OLD_CLK_AT91 is the same as AT91_USE_OLD_CLK, so you could
> > just use that instead. I suspect the 'USE_OF' dependency for
> > COMMON_CLK_AT91 can also go away, since all platforms are
> > either board file based and select AT91_USE_OLD_CLK, or they
> > are DT based and don't.
> 
> Here also, I didn't want to touch more because we need to remove the
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt file very soon (3.19) and I don't want
> to change this file (or all the SoC files) before the chunks related to
> these directives simply go away.
> 
> Tell me if it makes sense.

Yes, I agree your approach is better then.

	Arnd