Re: [PATCH V6 4/4] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce system suspend resume support

[Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>]

On 8/3/23 1:42 AM, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> Introduce system suspend resume calls that will allow the ti_sci
> driver to support deep sleep low power mode when the user space issues a
> suspend to mem.
> 
> Also, write a ti_sci_prepare_system_suspend call to be used in the driver
> suspend handler to allow the system to identify the low power mode being
> entered and if necessary, send TISCI_MSG_PREPARE_SLEEP with information
> about the mode is being entered and the address for allocated memory for
> storing the context during Deep Sleep.
> 
> We're using "pm_suspend_target_state" to map the kernel's target suspend
> state to SysFW low power mode. Make sure this is available only when
> CONFIG_SUSPEND is enabled.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Vlaev <g-vlaev@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> ---
>   drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 0334ade19868..172b726e00a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   #include <linux/soc/ti/ti-msgmgr.h>
>   #include <linux/soc/ti/ti_sci_protocol.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>   #include <linux/reboot.h>
>   
>   #include "ti_sci.h"
> @@ -3521,6 +3522,67 @@ static int tisci_reboot_handler(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long mode,
>   	return NOTIFY_BAD;
>   }
>   
> +static int ti_sci_prepare_system_suspend(struct ti_sci_info *info)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> +	u8 mode;
> +
> +	/* Map and validate the target Linux suspend state to TISCI LPM. */
> +	switch (pm_suspend_target_state) {
> +	case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
> +		/* S2MEM is not supported by the firmware. */
> +		if (!(info->fw_caps & MSG_FLAG_CAPS_LPM_DEEP_SLEEP))
> +			return 0;
> +		mode = TISCI_MSG_VALUE_SLEEP_MODE_DEEP_SLEEP;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		/*
> +		 * Do not fail if we don't have action to take for a
> +		 * specific suspend mode.
> +		 */
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ti_sci_cmd_prepare_sleep(&info->handle, mode,
> +					(u32)(info->ctx_mem_addr & 0xffffffff),
> +					(u32)((u64)info->ctx_mem_addr >> 32), 0);
> +#else
> +	return 0;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sci_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sci_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation(&info->handle, TISCI_MSG_VALUE_IO_ENABLE);

After this the will the IOs be in isolation? Or does the firmware wait
until power down begins later?

Andrew

> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "%s: set I/O isolation: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_prepare_system_suspend(info);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sci_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct ti_sci_info *info = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation(&info->handle, TISCI_MSG_VALUE_IO_DISABLE);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "%s: disable I/O isolation: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ti_sci_pm_ops, ti_sci_suspend, ti_sci_resume);
> +
>   static int ti_sci_init_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   			       struct ti_sci_info *info)
>   {
> @@ -3759,6 +3821,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ti_sci_driver = {
>   	.driver = {
>   		   .name = "ti-sci",
>   		   .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ti_sci_of_match),
> +		   .pm = &ti_sci_pm_ops,
>   	},
>   };
>   module_platform_driver(ti_sci_driver);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel