From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] arm64/mm: Reject memory removal that splits a kernel leaf mapping
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 13:39:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3884dd41-8ab1-45ee-8daa-198384d59c20@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2b81b60-eb8e-44a2-84fe-8c61bc5fadbe@kernel.org>
On 3/5/26 13:37, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/5/26 06:31, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Linear and vmemmap mappings that get torn down during a memory hot remove
>> operation might contain leaf level entries on any page table level. If the
>> requested memory range's linear or vmemmap mappings falls within such leaf
>> entries, new mappings need to be created for the remaining memory mapped on
>> the leaf entry earlier, following standard break before make aka BBM rules.
>> But kernel cannot tolerate BBM and hence remapping to fine grained leaves
>> would not be possible on systems without BBML2_NOABORT.
>>
>> Currently memory hot remove operation does not perform such restructuring,
>> and so removing memory ranges that could split a kernel leaf level mapping
>> need to be rejected.
>>
>> While memory_hotplug.c does appear to permit hot removing arbitrary ranges
>> of memory, the higher layers that drive memory_hotplug (e.g. ACPI, virtio,
>> ...) all appear to treat memory as fixed size devices. So it is impossible
>> to hot unplug a different amount than was previously hot plugged, and hence
>> we should never see a rejection in practice, but adding the check makes us
>> robust against a future change.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aWZYXhrT6D2M-7-N@willie-the-truck/
>> Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> Suggested-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * PFN range's linear map edges are leaf entry aligned
>> + */
>
> Nit: single-line comments are usually written as
>
> /* ... */
>
>> + start = __phys_to_virt(phys_start);
>> + end = __phys_to_virt(phys_end);
>> + if (addr_splits_kernel_leaf(start) || addr_splits_kernel_leaf(end)) {
>> + pr_warn("[%lx %lx] splits a leaf entry in linear map\n",
>> + phys_start, phys_end);
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * PFN range's vmemmap edges are leaf entry aligned
>> + */
>
> Dito.
>
> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
>
In fact,
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
:)
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-05 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 5:31 [PATCH V4 0/2] arm64/mm: Enable batched TLB flush in unmap_hotplug_range() Anshuman Khandual
2026-03-05 5:31 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] " Anshuman Khandual
2026-03-05 12:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-05 5:31 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] arm64/mm: Reject memory removal that splits a kernel leaf mapping Anshuman Khandual
2026-03-05 12:37 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-05 12:39 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-03-06 2:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3884dd41-8ab1-45ee-8daa-198384d59c20@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox