From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:08:03 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable modules for sound
 on LCDK
In-Reply-To: <20160817101331.GA8009@gobelin>
References: <20160810200853.24275-1-kbeldan@baylibre.com>
 <20160810200853.24275-2-kbeldan@baylibre.com>
 <52f428a2-7818-5f3a-bb66-70e2eaa63e7a@ti.com> <20160817101331.GA8009@gobelin>
Message-ID: <388d5e63-ff82-ca88-c60a-24ad87700afd@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wednesday 17 August 2016 03:43 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:20:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 August 2016 01:38 AM, Karl Beldan wrote:
>>> This is the minimal set of additional modules required to support audio
>>> on the LCDK.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan <kbeldan@baylibre.com>
>>
>> This patch does not apply because Kevin already added some missing audio
>> modules through commit "ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable DA850 audio
>> as modules"
>>
>> Can you please rebase on master branch of my tree[1] and resend?
>>
> 
> I checked out your tree.
> With Kevin's patch the needed modules get selected without needing 2/2.
> 
> However I don't know why he used:
>  CONFIG_SND_DA850_SOC_EVM=m
> instead of: 
>  CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP=m
>  CONFIG_SND_SOC_TLV320AIC3X=m
> The former seems to me to be pre-DT style config. I used the latter in
> 2/2 and thought that's what we'd start switching to ? Unless it is for
> pre-DT compatibility ?

I don't think this is related to DT. As you said,
CONFIG_SND_DA850_SOC_EVM selects CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP and
CONFIG_SND_SOC_TLV320AIC3X anyway.

To be honest, I am okay either way. Copying Peter to see if he has any
preference.

Thanks,
Sekhar