Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Add rpmsg-eth subnode

["Anwar, Md Danish" <a0501179@ti.com>]

On 9/3/2025 6:24 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/09/2025 09:57, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml     | 6 ++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
>>>> index a492f74a8608..4dbd708ec8ee 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml
>>>> @@ -210,6 +210,12 @@ patternProperties:
>>>>            should be defined as per the generic bindings in,
>>>>            Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
>>>>  
>>>> +      rpmsg-eth:
>>>> +        $ref: /schemas/net/ti,rpmsg-eth.yaml
>>>
>>> No, not a separate device. Please read slides from my DT for beginners
>>
>> I had synced with Andrew and we came to the conclusion that including
>> rpmsg-eth this way will follow the DT guidelines and should be okay.
> 
> ... and did you check the guidelines? Instead of repeating something not
> related to my comment rather bring argument matching the comment.
> 
> 
> ...
> 
>> @@ -768,6 +774,7 @@ &main_r5fss0_core0 {
>>  	mboxes = <&mailbox0_cluster2 &mbox_main_r5fss0_core0>;
>>  	memory-region = <&main_r5fss0_core0_dma_memory_region>,
>>  			<&main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region>;
>> +	rpmsg-eth-region = <&main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region_shm>;
> 
> You already have here memory-region, so use that one.
> 

There is a problem with using memory-region. If I add
`main_r5fss0_core0_memory_region_shm` to memory region, to get this
phandle from driver I would have to use
	
	of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", 2)

Where 2 is the index for this region. But the problem is how would the
driver know this index. This index can vary for different vendors and
their rproc device.

If some other vendor tries to use this driver but their memory-region
has 3 existing entries. so this this entry will be the 4th one.

But the driver code won't work for this. We need to have a way to know
which index to look for in existing memory-region which can defer from
vendor to vendor.

So to avoid this, I thought of using a new memory region. Which will
have only 1 entry specifically for this case, and the driver can always

	of_parse_phandle(np, "rpmsg-eth-region", 0)

to get the memory region.

>>  };
>>
>>  &main_r5fss0_core1 {
>>
>>
>> In this approach I am creating a new phandle to a memory region that
>> will be used by my device.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar