From: arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com (Arvind Yadav)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7 v2] net: ethernet: i825xx: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 11:04:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39363858-995c-eea4-070e-b21a7ac49bec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204.132556.1601454745789376393.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
On Monday 04 December 2017 11:55 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:18:20 +0530
>
>> @@ -120,9 +120,10 @@ static int sni_82596_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>> netdevice->dev_addr[5] = readb(eth_addr + 0x06);
>> iounmap(eth_addr);
>>
>> - if (!netdevice->irq) {
>> + if (netdevice->irq <= 0) {
>> printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IRQ not found for i82596 at 0x%lx\n",
>> __FILE__, netdevice->base_addr);
>> + retval = netdevice->irq ? netdevice->irq : -ENODEV;
>> goto probe_failed;
>> }
> Ok, thinking about this some more...
>
> It is impossible to use platform_get_irq() without every single call
> site having this funny:
>
> ret = val ? val : -ENODEV;
>
> sequence.
>
> This is unnecessary duplication and it is also error prone, so I
> really think this logic belongs in platform_get_irq() itself. It can
> convert '0' to -ENODEV and that way we need no special logic in the
> callers at all.
platform_get_irq() will return 0 only for sparc, If sparc initialize
platform
data irq[PROMINTR_MAX] as zero. Otherwise platform_get_irq() will never
return
0. It will return either IRQ number or error (as negative number). But I
am getting
review comment by reviewer/maintainer in other subsystem to add check for
zero. So I have done same changes here. Please correct me if i am wrong.
~arvind
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 17:48 [PATCH 0/7 v2] net: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Arvind Yadav
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/7 v2] net: bcmgenet: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-05 1:01 ` Doug Berger
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/7 v2] net: ezchip: nps_enet: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 3/7 v2] can: xilinx: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 4/7 v2] net: ethernet: i825xx: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-04 18:25 ` David Miller
2017-12-05 5:34 ` Arvind Yadav [this message]
2017-12-05 15:49 ` David Miller
2017-12-06 12:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-12-08 9:38 ` arvindY
2017-12-05 10:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-12-05 10:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 5/7 v2] net: ethernet: natsemi: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 6/7 v2] net: ethernet: smsc: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-04 17:48 ` [PATCH 7/7 v2] net: fjes: " Arvind Yadav
2017-12-05 9:54 ` [PATCH 0/7 v2] net: " Sergei Shtylyov
2017-12-05 9:57 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2017-12-05 10:02 ` Arvind Yadav
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39363858-995c-eea4-070e-b21a7ac49bec@gmail.com \
--to=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).