From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 09:47:01 +0200
Subject: [GIT PULL 5/7] Broadcom maintainers changes for 4.8 Part 1
In-Reply-To: <CACna6rxXQuU7MqFomqK8tUoyFgiH-nC-M9UEyvKk1rXs8yS64A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1466128575-5378-1-git-send-email-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20160620055143.GH2329@localhost>
 <CACna6rxXQuU7MqFomqK8tUoyFgiH-nC-M9UEyvKk1rXs8yS64A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3965618.mynEkqfry0@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Monday, June 20, 2016 9:35:53 AM CEST Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote:
> 
> I was asked by Florian to add bcm-kernel-feedback-list@ but indeed he
> didn't specify if this should be L: entry.
> [21:24:43] <[florian]> rmilecki: also submit a patch that includes
> bcm-kernel-feedback-list at broadcom.com in the MAINTAINERS file for
> BCM5310X
> [21:36:51] <rmilecki> [florian]: I wasn't sure if I'm supposed to do that
> [21:36:53] <rmilecki> i can try I guess
> 
> I'm afraid this mailing list is closed. Would M: entry work for it?


I think M: is better, we have a couple of examples like that (x86 at kernel.org,
Dept-GELinuxNICDev at qlogic.com, linux-wimax at intel.com, ...).

	Arnd