From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add extended stateid power_state support
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:23:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3982126.UybqODJKJo@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMAWPa9ZLGidg3r8RJY9MANdmjPdJ07S7mmixQBf_g3YPce1_g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 22 October 2015 15:07:06 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Spam Status: Spamassassin CRM114
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> wrote:
> > PSCI v1.0 augmented the power_state parameter format specification
> > (extended stateid) and introduced a way to probe it through the
> > PSCI_FEATURES interface.
> >
> > This patch implements code that detects the power_state format at
> > run-time through the PSCI_FEATURES interface, so that the power_state
> > argument can be properly detected and validated in the kernel according
> > to the information provided through firmware.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> kernelci.org started finding a new boot failures in the arm-soc tree
> on arm64 qemu[1] and it was bisected down to this patch, which is in
> arm-soc in the form of commit a5c00bb28da0 (drivers: firmware: psci:
> add extended stateid power_state support)
>
> The patch doesn't revert cleanly, so I didn't dig much further, but
> this suggests that some more testing on qemu is needed (or does qemu
> need to be upgraded?)
>
> Kevin
>
> [1] http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/arm-soc/kernel/v4.3-rc5-557-g159ca7e43189/
>
Could it be that qemu claims to support psci-1.0 but is actually not
compatible?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-23 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-08 17:16 [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add basic v1.0 support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-08 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add INVALID_ADDRESS return value Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-08 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drivers: firmware: psci: move power_state handling to generic code Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-09 13:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-08 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add PSCI_FEATURES call Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-08 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add extended stateid power_state support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-22 22:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-10-23 10:23 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-10-23 10:44 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-23 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-23 11:36 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-23 15:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-10-26 10:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-07-08 17:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add PSCI v1.0 DT bindings Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-10-05 11:48 ` Andre Przywara
2015-10-05 12:06 ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-05 12:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-14 13:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] drivers: firmware: psci: add basic v1.0 support Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-09-15 3:23 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3982126.UybqODJKJo@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox