From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: imp@bsdimp.com (Warner Losh) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 12:09:00 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: davinci-nand: add dts property for NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE option In-Reply-To: <532B2D3F.6050004@ti.com> References: <1395335184-4745-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> <1395335184-4745-3-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> <532B2183.2080309@ti.com> <20140320172912.GW31517@norris-Latitude-E6410> <532B2766.6090506@ti.com> <532B2D3F.6050004@ti.com> Message-ID: <3A49495A-CE1E-46DA-A003-7863C982CA81@bsdimp.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Thursday 20 March 2014 01:44 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Mar 20, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thursday 20 March 2014 01:29 PM, Brian Norris wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:12:35PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>>>> Boris, >>>> >>>> Who's Boris? And why should Boris be taking this patch? It's an MTD >>>> patch. >>>> >>> I got your name completely wrong. Sorry.... >>> >>>>> On Thursday 20 March 2014 01:06 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >>>>>> From: Murali Karicheri >>>>>> >>>>>> After testing NAND flash with ubifs for k2hk-emv board were committed >>>>>> that flash doesn't support subpage writing, so we can fix it by >>>>>> adding a property to disable subpage write. >>>> >>>> What flash? We try to autodetect NAND as much as possible. Perhaps we >>>> should be adding infrastructure support instead of hacking it with a DT >>>> property. >>>> >>> We can't auto detect it and thats why the DT approach was taken. We >>> will double check that. >> >> I though sub page writing was one of the fields in the onfi and/or jedec(toggle) meta data structures. Have you looked there? >> > Am not sure if I follow you. The limitation is from the TI NAND controller(AEMIF) and > not the NAND memory. Then never mind. I thought it was the other side of things. Warner