From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2A0C433DB for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673D0230FF for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:56:51 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 673D0230FF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=K9OZgSMjUxZ3kdGhTGDEMCAMItUFeynPHOgr3G/O9S8=; b=q5/FWOpVTvBCY2sNqtFMrw4+X h/GmDLM4qbZyt4tEzkg7ummbvVTHj5osEfBaA1059R/Caw8fKJ4rTOvgC+ljkVm9wKpwwH+ZdBBhV iXkZ9skYUIjK9YSKw6rk/hact/Z2KglWPlcyjMMXp5GAK75/oVzpskexDxnNV5XTLYI/Xd+hvXEOR RHTtu4HRAhrI3I6BxfcM1v6cdf/wp0ZzbxtyvGvnQGF1vHz/vhM0G+BDYaukXMsR/kjqV92uaJYMg inqI/XG0eMck6baTTW3Ek804oXLzf9a5S6AJkiBEumwbu53c1vIoonk+HVknWr1NDVNSARiS6ZFbi CU2XC7vQw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l42Kb-0001Eg-D5; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:55:01 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l42KY-0001E3-8A for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:54:59 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2788822B3B; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org ([51.254.78.96] helo=www.loen.fr) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l42KU-009t4p-SC; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:54:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:54:54 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/21] arm64: Move "nokaslr" over to the early cpufeature infrastructure In-Reply-To: References: <20210125105019.2946057-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210125105019.2946057-19-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.10 Message-ID: <3a98ff1db79c90c96038b924eb534643@kernel.org> X-Sender: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 51.254.78.96 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ardb@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dbrazdil@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, jingzhangos@google.com, pajay@qti.qualcomm.com, psodagud@codeaurora.org, sramana@codeaurora.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210125_085458_417921_7B378F42 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 29.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Jing Zhang , Prasad Sodagudi , Srinivas Ramana , Suzuki K Poulose , Catalin Marinas , Alexandru Elisei , Linux Kernel Mailing List , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Ajay Patil , Android Kernel Team , David Brazdil , Will Deacon , kvmarm , Linux ARM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2021-01-25 12:54, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 11:53, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> Given that the early cpufeature infrastructure has borrowed quite >> a lot of code from the kaslr implementation, let's reimplement >> the matching of the "nokaslr" option with it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier >> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas >> Acked-by: David Brazdil >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c | 15 +++++++++++++ >> arch/arm64/kernel/kaslr.c | 36 >> ++---------------------------- >> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c >> b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c >> index cbb8eaa48742..3ccf51b84ba4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c >> @@ -31,8 +31,22 @@ static const struct ftr_set_desc mmfr1 __initdata = >> { >> }, >> }; >> >> +extern struct arm64_ftr_override kaslr_feature_override; >> + >> +static const struct ftr_set_desc kaslr __initdata = { > > This should be __initconst not __initdata (below too) > >> + .name = "kaslr", >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE >> + .override = &kaslr_feature_override, >> +#endif >> + .fields = { >> + { "disabled", 0 }, >> + {} >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> static const struct ftr_set_desc * const regs[] __initdata = { >> &mmfr1, >> + &kaslr, >> }; >> >> static const struct { >> @@ -41,6 +55,7 @@ static const struct { >> } aliases[] __initdata = { >> { "kvm-arm.mode=nvhe", "id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" }, >> { "kvm-arm.mode=protected", "id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" }, >> + { "nokaslr", "kaslr.disabled=1" }, >> }; >> > > This struct now takes up > - ~100 bytes for the characters themselves (which btw are not emitted > into __initdata or __initconst) > - 6x8 bytes for the char pointers > - 6x24 bytes for the RELA relocations that annotate these pointers as > quantities that need to be relocated at boot (on a kernel built with > KASLR) > > I know it's only a drop in the ocean, but in this case, where the > struct is statically declared and defined only once, and in the same > place, we could easily turn this into > > static const struct { > char alias[24]; > char param[20]; > }; > > and get rid of all the overhead. The only slightly annoying thing is > that the array sizes need to be kept in sync with the largest instance > appearing in the array, but this is easy when the struct type is > declared in the same place where its only instance is defined. Fair enough. I personally find the result butt-ugly, but I agree that it certainly saves some memory. Does the following work for you? I can even give symbolic names to the various constants (how generous of me! ;-). Thanks, M. diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c index d1310438d95c..9e7043bdc808 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/idreg-override.c @@ -14,15 +14,15 @@ #include struct ftr_set_desc { - const char *name; + char name[20]; struct arm64_ftr_override *override; struct { - const char *name; + char name[20]; u8 shift; } fields[]; }; -static const struct ftr_set_desc mmfr1 __initdata = { +static const struct ftr_set_desc mmfr1 __initconst = { .name = "id_aa64mmfr1", .override = &id_aa64mmfr1_override, .fields = { @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static const struct ftr_set_desc mmfr1 __initdata = { }, }; -static const struct ftr_set_desc pfr1 __initdata = { +static const struct ftr_set_desc pfr1 __initconst = { .name = "id_aa64pfr1", .override = &id_aa64pfr1_override, .fields = { @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static const struct ftr_set_desc pfr1 __initdata = { }, }; -static const struct ftr_set_desc isar1 __initdata = { +static const struct ftr_set_desc isar1 __initconst = { .name = "id_aa64isar1", .override = &id_aa64isar1_override, .fields = { @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static const struct ftr_set_desc isar1 __initdata = { extern struct arm64_ftr_override kaslr_feature_override; -static const struct ftr_set_desc kaslr __initdata = { +static const struct ftr_set_desc kaslr __initconst = { .name = "kaslr", #ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE .override = &kaslr_feature_override, @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static const struct ftr_set_desc kaslr __initdata = { }, }; -static const struct ftr_set_desc * const regs[] __initdata = { +static const struct ftr_set_desc * const regs[] __initconst = { &mmfr1, &pfr1, &isar1, @@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ static const struct ftr_set_desc * const regs[] __initdata = { }; static const struct { - const char *alias; - const char *feature; -} aliases[] __initdata = { + char alias[30]; + char feature[80]; +} aliases[] __initconst = { { "kvm-arm.mode=nvhe", "id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" }, { "kvm-arm.mode=protected", "id_aa64mmfr1.vh=0" }, { "arm64.nobti", "id_aa64pfr1.bt=0" }, -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel