From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813BCC79FAD for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2026 09:15:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=a1Qjg46nmHCVbooCZPCrDuWX3aehr3OoOopE6rMLjvA=; b=BFnEkdX1piCWT7GUnRncHkZ44A /5JqUEwe5AfYhb6r10TK/+O/S/yd2sYE2GaR2obM5VGvfKM7tgnwnahhL0T5A/7F/ckFFmKYMuYSU 7N4vAvfgLVRfhUrWT8eQc9Btv/XT6bfEWjgte4sVhXcYaBxMjfG1eQlAaU+4EXHjqKksj0nFrgH55 dGFo6Etv/6al+ECrb84V33WtVKUflscUSnr5u6RTpcJcpWlyQl1RWGbU6RkAi8ko93jaXFjVhMVrH VgLg91plvHxAMMTNQADv6yodK048+O2I0sqAEY2Z30akwNEwMB0GGtIUzOOuFmvLk/tr8+bOkh1Hx qDJrtkbQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x4EOw-0000000BG9t-0s72; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:15:30 +0000 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com ([148.251.105.195]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x4EOu-0000000BG8x-0qg4; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 09:15:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1788945325; bh=Q1hPFcHkvswbhbdcsLOQX7sUlSGIB2PG8xMG+T49BdU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=dT2IlqVYjgDxGh0a45aUg5OLWqBfn58Tqt+giiqkH/WI7jCVZTpq39H7OPXvyc+9k Y7bmq7IYqc98Lfkus42umstvLW4rDYwwLXiRDBWrE69flsMPUEkSDwRLTQoQrqN8// 3gASZwZWUVen+9+pS4SKdmBNCG5c+lkO6TUtRKxiYEJZJKsrvxI1xHnCxH0caEpkRh KU0WcYboDKQFpEtc3jES2L/YVxBFQmtLHoyU/mNFh4FjPzvLP++Mw3sQ+cFhpeBHUe tWs4wzGEGcrtF51V24DffIbEm8ehBowmunz6LbYkd+S6ntCu2Oarxo8mfP7KjcYC4j df2B9WEsk0Qpw== Received: from [100.64.1.21] (unknown [100.64.1.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDED317E06E0; Wed, 09 Sep 2026 11:15:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3bb91821-e618-4992-8f95-8e2631568bbe@collabora.com> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 11:15:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188: mt8188-afe-clk: Propagate regmap update errors To: Mark Brown , Cezary Rojewski Cc: phucduc.bui@gmail.com, Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Kees Cook , Kuninori Morimoto , Trevor Wu , Douglas Anderson , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Brugger References: <20260907120310.135693-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> <20260907120310.135693-4-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260909_021528_461958_B60AE8EF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.93 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 9/8/26 20:52, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: > >> I'd expect someone from Mediatek to verify this. While I agree with the >> change, some drivers follow "ignore register update result" arch and, >> what was previously ignored will now cause basic operations to fail. > > We don't really get any review from Mediatek, AngeloGioacchino used to > try to cover things but it seems he got busy recently :( Yeah, sorry about that, it's busy-busy-busy days here. Also I had a summer break, so 1+1=ouch :-) The changes are fine, those regmap updates always succeed, that's why it works, and ignoring an error there would actually break things. Cheers, Angelo