From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Srivathsa L Rao <srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@qti.qualcomm.com>,
Niyas Sait <niyas.sait@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] arm_mpam: Split the locking around the mon_sel registers
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 22:01:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bf11efe-74ca-4026-864f-12bcb4537983@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702162229.4008659-13-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Hi Andre,
On 7/2/26 17:22, Andre Przywara wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>
> The MSC MON_SEL register needs to be accessed from hardirq for the overflow
> interrupt,
There is no current support for overflow interrupts.
and when taking an IPI to access these registers on platforms
> where MSC are not accesible from every CPU.
This is the case for the registers requiring the part_sel mutex.
This makes an irqsave
> spinlock the obvious lock to protect these registers. On systems with SCMI
> mailboxes it must be able to sleep, meaning a mutex must be used.
What problems do we hit if we convert the mon_sel lock to a mutex?
Thanks,
Ben
The
> SCMI platforms can't support an overflow interrupt.
>
> Clearly these two can't exist for one MSC at the same time.
>
> Split the existing helper into a raw spinlock and a mutex, named inner
> and outer. The outer lock must be taken in an a pre-emptible context
> before the inner lock can be taken. On systems with SCMI mailboxes
> where the MON_SEL accesses must sleep - the inner lock will fail to be
> taken if the caller is unable to sleep.
> This will allow callers to fail without having to explicitly check
> the interface type of each MSC.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> [Andre: remove redundant outer lock in mpam_reprogram_msc()]
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index addc25e78345..824bc6c97851 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static bool mpam_ris_hw_probe_csu_nrdy(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> bool can_set, can_clear;
> struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(msc)))
> return false;
>
> mon_sel = FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_MON_SEL, 0) |
> @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static bool mpam_ris_hw_probe_csu_nrdy(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> if (_mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MSMON_CSU, &now))
> return false;
> can_clear = !(now & MSMON___NRDY);
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
>
> return (!can_set || !can_clear);
> }
> @@ -961,7 +961,9 @@ static int mpam_ris_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> mpam_set_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu_xcl, props);
>
> /* Is NRDY hardware managed? */
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> hw_managed = mpam_ris_hw_probe_csu_nrdy(ris);
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
>
> /*
> * Accept the missing firmware property if NRDY appears
> @@ -1334,7 +1336,7 @@ static void __ris_msmon_read(void *arg)
> struct mpam_msc *msc = m->ris->vmsc->msc;
> u32 mon_sel, ctl_val, flt_val, cur_ctl, cur_flt;
>
> - if (!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)) {
> + if (!mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(msc)) {
> m->err = -EIO;
> return;
> }
> @@ -1441,7 +1443,7 @@ static void __ris_msmon_read(void *arg)
> default:
> m->err = -EINVAL;
> }
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
>
> if (nrdy)
> m->err = -EBUSY;
> @@ -1452,7 +1454,7 @@ static void __ris_msmon_read(void *arg)
> return;
>
> out_unlock:
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
>
> m->err = ret;
> }
> @@ -1468,6 +1470,7 @@ static int _msmon_read(struct mpam_component *comp, struct mon_read *arg)
> struct mpam_msc *msc = vmsc->msc;
> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris;
>
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> list_for_each_entry_srcu(ris, &vmsc->ris, vmsc_list,
> srcu_read_lock_held(&mpam_srcu)) {
> arg->ris = ris;
> @@ -1486,6 +1489,7 @@ static int _msmon_read(struct mpam_component *comp, struct mon_read *arg)
> if (err)
> any_err = err;
> }
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> }
>
> return any_err;
> @@ -1568,18 +1572,20 @@ void mpam_msmon_reset_mbwu(struct mpam_component *comp, struct mon_cfg *ctx)
> continue;
>
> msc = vmsc->msc;
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> list_for_each_entry_srcu(ris, &vmsc->ris, vmsc_list,
> srcu_read_lock_held(&mpam_srcu)) {
> if (!mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu, &ris->props))
> continue;
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(msc)))
> continue;
>
> ris->mbwu_state[ctx->mon].correction = 0;
> ris->mbwu_state[ctx->mon].reset_on_next_read = true;
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
> }
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1781,8 +1787,11 @@ static int mpam_restore_mbwu_state(void *_ris)
> int ret = 0;
> struct mon_read mwbu_arg;
> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris = _ris;
> + struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
> struct mpam_class *class = ris->vmsc->comp->class;
>
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < ris->props.num_mbwu_mon; i++) {
> if (ris->mbwu_state[i].enabled) {
> mwbu_arg.ris = ris;
> @@ -1798,10 +1807,12 @@ static int mpam_restore_mbwu_state(void *_ris)
> }
> }
>
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/* Call with MSC cfg_lock held */
> +/* Call with MSC cfg_lock and outer mon_sel lock held */
> static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -1817,7 +1828,7 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> mbwu_state = &ris->mbwu_state[i];
> cfg = &mbwu_state->cfg;
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)))
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(msc)))
> return -EIO;
>
> mon_sel = FIELD_PREP(MSMON_CFG_MON_SEL_MON_SEL, i) |
> @@ -1853,7 +1864,9 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> mbwu_state->correction += val;
> mbwu_state->enabled = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN, cur_ctl);
> }
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> +
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
> +
> if (ret)
> break;
> }
> @@ -2050,6 +2063,7 @@ static int mpam_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris;
>
> mutex_lock(&msc->cfg_lock);
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> list_for_each_entry_srcu(ris, &msc->ris, msc_list,
> srcu_read_lock_held(&mpam_srcu)) {
> mpam_touch_msc(msc, &mpam_reset_ris, ris);
> @@ -2063,6 +2077,7 @@ static int mpam_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> if (mpam_is_enabled())
> mpam_touch_msc(msc, &mpam_save_mbwu_state, ris);
> }
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> mutex_unlock(&msc->cfg_lock);
> }
> }
> @@ -2756,11 +2771,13 @@ static void __destroy_component_cfg(struct mpam_component *comp)
> list_for_each_entry(vmsc, &comp->vmsc, comp_list) {
> msc = vmsc->msc;
>
> - if (mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)) {
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> + if (mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(msc)) {
> list_for_each_entry(ris, &vmsc->ris, vmsc_list)
> add_to_garbage(ris->mbwu_state);
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
> }
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2807,6 +2824,7 @@ static int __allocate_component_cfg(struct mpam_component *comp)
> mpam_reset_component_cfg(comp);
>
> list_for_each_entry(vmsc, &comp->vmsc, comp_list) {
> + int err = 0;
> struct mpam_msc *msc;
> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris;
> struct msmon_mbwu_state *mbwu_state;
> @@ -2815,6 +2833,7 @@ static int __allocate_component_cfg(struct mpam_component *comp)
> continue;
>
> msc = vmsc->msc;
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> list_for_each_entry(ris, &vmsc->ris, vmsc_list) {
> if (!ris->props.num_mbwu_mon)
> continue;
> @@ -2823,16 +2842,21 @@ static int __allocate_component_cfg(struct mpam_component *comp)
> ris->props.num_mbwu_mon);
> if (!mbwu_state) {
> __destroy_component_cfg(comp);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + break;
> }
>
> init_garbage(&mbwu_state[0].garbage);
>
> - if (mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)) {
> + if (mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(msc)) {
> ris->mbwu_state = mbwu_state;
> - mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(msc);
> }
> }
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -3085,12 +3109,14 @@ int mpam_apply_config(struct mpam_component *comp, u16 partid,
> msc = vmsc->msc;
>
> mutex_lock(&msc->cfg_lock);
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(msc);
> list_for_each_entry_srcu(ris, &vmsc->ris, vmsc_list,
> srcu_read_lock_held(&mpam_srcu)) {
> arg.ris = ris;
> mpam_touch_msc(msc, __write_config, &arg);
> ris->in_reset_state = false;
> }
> + mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(msc);
> mutex_unlock(&msc->cfg_lock);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> index 04d1a59f02af..4616f1283f1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -116,16 +116,20 @@ struct mpam_msc {
> /*
> * mon_sel_lock protects access to the MSC hardware registers that are
> * affected by MPAMCFG_MON_SEL, and the mbwu_state.
> - * Access to mon_sel is needed from both process and interrupt contexts,
> - * but is complicated by firmware-backed platforms that can't make any
> - * access unless they can sleep.
> - * Always use the mpam_mon_sel_lock() helpers.
> - * Accesses to mon_sel need to be able to fail if they occur in the wrong
> - * context.
> + * Both the 'inner' and 'outer' must be taken.
> + * For real MMIO MSC, the outer lock is unnecessary - but keeps the
> + * code common with:
> + * Firmware backed MSC need to sleep when accessing the MSC, which
> + * means some code-paths will always fail. For these MSC the outer
> + * lock is providing the protection, and the inner lock fails to
> + * be taken if the task is unable to sleep.
> + *
> * If needed, take msc->probe_lock first.
> */
> - raw_spinlock_t _mon_sel_lock;
> - unsigned long _mon_sel_flags;
> + struct mutex outer_mon_sel_lock;
> + bool outer_lock_held;
> + raw_spinlock_t inner_mon_sel_lock;
> + unsigned long inner_mon_sel_flags;
>
> void __iomem *mapped_hwpage;
> size_t mapped_hwpage_sz;
> @@ -137,29 +141,56 @@ struct mpam_msc {
> };
>
> /* Returning false here means accesses to mon_sel must fail and report an error. */
> -static inline bool __must_check mpam_mon_sel_lock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +static inline bool __must_check mpam_mon_sel_inner_lock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> - /* Locking will require updating to support a firmware backed interface */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(msc->iface != MPAM_IFACE_MMIO))
> - return false;
> + /*
> + * The outer lock may be taken by a CPU that then issues an IPI to run
> + * a helper that takes the inner lock. lockdep can't help us here.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(msc->outer_lock_held));
> +
> + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) {
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&msc->inner_mon_sel_lock, msc->inner_mon_sel_flags);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + /* Accesses must fail if we are not pre-emptible */
> + return !!preemptible();
> +}
>
> - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags);
> - return true;
> +static inline void mpam_mon_sel_inner_unlock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +{
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(msc->outer_lock_held));
> +
> + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO)
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msc->inner_mon_sel_lock, msc->inner_mon_sel_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mpam_mon_sel_outer_lock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&msc->outer_mon_sel_lock);
> + msc->outer_lock_held = true;
> }
>
> -static inline void mpam_mon_sel_unlock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +static inline void mpam_mon_sel_outer_unlock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags);
> + msc->outer_lock_held = false;
> + mutex_unlock(&msc->outer_mon_sel_lock);
> }
>
> static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!READ_ONCE(msc->outer_lock_held));
> + if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO)
> + lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->inner_mon_sel_lock);
> + else
> + lockdep_assert_preemption_enabled();
> }
>
> static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> - raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->inner_mon_sel_lock);
> + mutex_init(&msc->outer_mon_sel_lock);
> }
>
> /* Bits for mpam features bitmaps */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 16:22 [PATCH v2 00/15] arm_mpam: Add MPAM-Fb firmware support Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] arm_mpam: let low level MSC read accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for wrapper functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 19:56 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for hw_probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:00 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l() Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:06 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for msmon helpers Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for __ris_msmon_read() Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:14 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for state saving functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 20:19 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] arm_mpam: let low level MSC write accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for ESR and part_sel wrappers Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for hardware probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC write errors for remaining MSC write users Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] arm_mpam: Split the locking around the mon_sel registers Andre Przywara
2026-07-01 21:01 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] arm_mpam: add MPAM-Fb MSC firmware access support Andre Przywara
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] arm_mpam: prevent MPAM-Fb accesses inside IRQ handler Andre Przywara
2026-07-03 10:54 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-02 16:22 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] arm_mpam: detect and enable MPAM-Fb PCC support Andre Przywara
2026-07-03 11:00 ` Ben Horgan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3bf11efe-74ca-4026-864f-12bcb4537983@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=niyas.sait@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sramana@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox