Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>
To: Ciprian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	NXP S32 Linux Team <s32@nxp.com>,
	Christophe Lizzi <clizzi@redhat.com>,
	Alberto Ruiz <aruizrui@redhat.com>,
	Enric Balletbo <eballetb@redhat.com>,
	Eric Chanudet <echanude@redhat.com>,
	Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] can: flexcan: split rx/tx masks per mailbox IRQ line
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:42:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3bf39b4d-123f-42d3-bc05-fdb86a256e7e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609142954.1807421-4-ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>

On 09/06/2026 at 16:29, Ciprian Costea wrote:
> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
> 
> On S32G2, which has two mailbox IRQ lines (mb-0 for MBs 0-7, mb-1
> for MBs 8-63), both handlers currently process the full rx_mask/tx_mask
> range.
> 
> Introduce FLEXCAN_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ_MB0_MASK and
> FLEXCAN_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ_MB1_MASK to describe the split, and pass
> the selected mask to flexcan_do_mb() via a new mb_mask parameter.
> 
> In flexcan_irq_mb(), the irq argument selects the correct mask: the
> primary MB IRQ uses MB0_MASK and the secondary uses MB1_MASK.
> 
> For single-IRQ platforms, mb_mask is ~0ULL with no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
> Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetb@redhat.com>

Looks better than v5!

Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> index 7dde2e623def..0ed838f0719a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan/flexcan-core.c
> @@ -182,6 +182,12 @@
>  #define FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_WARN	BIT(6)
>  #define FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE	BIT(5)
>  
> +/* On platforms with FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ, the MB IRQ lines are
> + * split.
> + */
> +#define FLEXCAN_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ_MB0_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
> +#define FLEXCAN_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ_MB1_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(63, 8)

Nitpick: priv->rx_mask, priv->tx_mask and your mb_mask variable all have
type u64 so you could have used GENMASK_U64() to stay coherent with the
type. But you don't have to send a v6 just for this.

>  /* FLEXCAN message buffers */
>  #define FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_MASK		(0xf << 24)
>  #define FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_RX_BUSY_BIT	(0x1 << 24)
> @@ -957,14 +963,16 @@ static inline void flexcan_write64(struct flexcan_priv *priv, u64 val, void __io
>  		priv->write(lower_32_bits(val), addr);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(struct flexcan_priv *priv)
> +static inline u64 flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(struct flexcan_priv *priv,
> +					    u64 rx_mask)
>  {
> -	return flexcan_read64_mask(priv, &priv->regs->iflag1, priv->rx_mask);
> +	return flexcan_read64_mask(priv, &priv->regs->iflag1, rx_mask);
>  }
>  
> -static inline u64 flexcan_read_reg_iflag_tx(struct flexcan_priv *priv)
> +static inline u64 flexcan_read_reg_iflag_tx(struct flexcan_priv *priv,
> +					    u64 tx_mask)
>  {
> -	return flexcan_read64_mask(priv, &priv->regs->iflag1, priv->tx_mask);
> +	return flexcan_read64_mask(priv, &priv->regs->iflag1, tx_mask);
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct flexcan_priv *rx_offload_to_priv(struct can_rx_offload *offload)
> @@ -1071,12 +1079,14 @@ static struct sk_buff *flexcan_mailbox_read(struct can_rx_offload *offload,
>  }
>  
>  /* Process mailbox (RX + TX) events */
> -static irqreturn_t flexcan_do_mb(struct net_device *dev)
> +static irqreturn_t flexcan_do_mb(struct net_device *dev, u64 mb_mask)
>  {
>  	struct net_device_stats *stats = &dev->stats;
>  	struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->regs;
>  	irqreturn_t handled = IRQ_NONE;
> +	u64 rx_mask = priv->rx_mask & mb_mask;
> +	u64 tx_mask = priv->tx_mask & mb_mask;
>  	u64 reg_iflag_tx;
>  
>  	/* reception interrupt */
> @@ -1084,7 +1094,8 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_do_mb(struct net_device *dev)
>  		u64 reg_iflag_rx;
>  		int ret;
>  
> -		while ((reg_iflag_rx = flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(priv))) {
> +		while ((reg_iflag_rx = flexcan_read_reg_iflag_rx(priv,
> +								 rx_mask))) {
>  			handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
>  			ret = can_rx_offload_irq_offload_timestamp(&priv->offload,
>  								   reg_iflag_rx);
> @@ -1110,10 +1121,10 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_do_mb(struct net_device *dev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	reg_iflag_tx = flexcan_read_reg_iflag_tx(priv);
> +	reg_iflag_tx = flexcan_read_reg_iflag_tx(priv, tx_mask);
>  
>  	/* transmission complete interrupt */
> -	if (reg_iflag_tx & priv->tx_mask) {
> +	if (reg_iflag_tx & tx_mask) {
>  		u32 reg_ctrl = priv->read(&priv->tx_mb->can_ctrl);
>  
>  		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> @@ -1125,7 +1136,7 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_do_mb(struct net_device *dev)
>  		/* after sending a RTR frame MB is in RX mode */
>  		priv->write(FLEXCAN_MB_CODE_TX_INACTIVE,
>  			    &priv->tx_mb->can_ctrl);
> -		flexcan_write64(priv, priv->tx_mask, &regs->iflag1);
> +		flexcan_write64(priv, tx_mask, &regs->iflag1);
>  		netif_wake_queue(dev);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1228,7 +1239,7 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	irqreturn_t handled;
>  
> -	handled = flexcan_do_mb(dev);
> +	handled = flexcan_do_mb(dev, ~0ULL);
>  	handled |= flexcan_do_state(dev);
>  	handled |= flexcan_do_berr(dev);
>  
> @@ -1244,8 +1255,14 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_irq_mb(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
>  	struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>  	irqreturn_t handled;
> +	u64 mb_mask = ~0ULL;
> +
> +	if (priv->devtype_data.quirks & FLEXCAN_QUIRK_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ)
> +		mb_mask = (irq == priv->irq_secondary_mb) ?
> +			  FLEXCAN_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ_MB1_MASK :
> +			  FLEXCAN_SECONDARY_MB_IRQ_MB0_MASK;
>  
> -	handled = flexcan_do_mb(dev);
> +	handled = flexcan_do_mb(dev, mb_mask);
>  
>  	if (handled)
>  		can_rx_offload_irq_finish(&priv->offload);


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol



  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 14:29 [PATCH v5 0/8] can: flexcan: Add NXP S32N79 SoC support Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] can: flexcan: use dedicated IRQ handlers for multi-IRQ platforms Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 19:35   ` Vincent Mailhol
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] can: flexcan: disable all IRQ lines in flexcan_chip_interrupts_enable() Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 19:38   ` Vincent Mailhol
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] can: flexcan: split rx/tx masks per mailbox IRQ line Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 19:42   ` Vincent Mailhol [this message]
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add NXP S32N79 SoC support Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] can: flexcan: add FLEXCAN_QUIRK_IRQ_BERR quirk Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 19:51   ` Vincent Mailhol
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] can: flexcan: add NXP S32N79 SoC support Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 19:52   ` Vincent Mailhol
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: dts: s32n79: add FlexCAN nodes Ciprian Costea
2026-06-09 14:29 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] arm64: dts: s32n79: enable FlexCAN devices Ciprian Costea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3bf39b4d-123f-42d3-bc05-fdb86a256e7e@kernel.org \
    --to=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=aruizrui@redhat.com \
    --cc=ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=clizzi@redhat.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eballetb@redhat.com \
    --cc=echanude@redhat.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s32@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox