From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori) Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:08:26 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] ATA/ARM: convert ARM/DaVinci to use libata PATA drivers In-Reply-To: <20170316213255.GF1480@htj.duckdns.org> References: <1489509414-11491-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <20170316213255.GF1480@htj.duckdns.org> Message-ID: <3c115ec1-2d11-695e-eca7-25a75f71b96f@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 17 March 2017 03:02 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:36:51PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This patchset adds Palmchip BK3710 IDE controller driver to >> libata and switches ARM/DaVinci to use it (instead of the old >> IDE driver). >> >> Sekhar, please check that it still works after changes, thanks. >> >> Changes since v1 >> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg567442.html): >> - addressed review comments from Sergei Shtylyov >> - fixed cycle_time unitialized variable issue >> >> Changes since v0.1 draft patch version >> (https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg566932.html): >> - fixed cycle_time build warning >> - added platform support fixes from Sekhar >> - added defconfig changes from Sekhar >> - preserved platform support for the old IDE driver >> - split it on 3 patches > > Looks fine to me from libata side. Once it gets tested, how should > the patches be routed? I don't think it'd make sense to route them > separately. Hi Tejun, I can take the series through ARM-SoC tree with your ack. Thanks, Sekhar