From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B6BD7237B for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:44:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=r+VNQIibetsKXOEk2W6mNAkqaSCSDlfn7bngHe4/Oe0=; b=oapy317xq3rrgsLKG++0NuDzcC 7JB+FiEOGpz3b2C69GPMEEPUBGCWlolpkv1TFtI33rhFYUDIGeKpZS3Vz/kXmd5ZCkwj7Fjf57+bA dI93avQGWEiF7CwrpxjWs2/0QCmOrKjdJcOOQ9NVSAgJwCzo1oWoFRYvCiB2mnM0ku9VpC1/UyaAq 3guQdwpLysJPSy+RF3wKtjwG4Q6vVAcj5jbZDf32B+EccGWicou8W1VZmdpGwBK39ve2xRyHth9M7 S62Ac9XjmlEBjvHfAur8ZOk/PyUBQmvHz9N3N0JKBiFiy5eYan2BiJO1ikt/JPiOv/ruCtGdQK5x9 57VMkAow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vjFa7-00000008rvr-1p5f; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:44:03 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vjFa4-00000008rv1-3LYp for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:44:02 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C041C1476; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 03:43:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.57.52.8] (unknown [10.57.52.8]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2637C3F632; Fri, 23 Jan 2026 03:43:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3c6bddfd-a674-486c-add4-35ef93ec88c4@arm.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 11:43:37 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] firmware: arm_scmi: Use new Telemetry traces To: Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, etienne.carriere@st.com, peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, michal.simek@amd.com, dan.carpenter@linaro.org, d-gole@ti.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, philip.radford@arm.com, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com, elif.topuz@arm.com References: <20260114114638.2290765-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20260114114638.2290765-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Elif Topuz In-Reply-To: <20260114114638.2290765-8-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260123_034400_922945_DF13DA9C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Cristian, On 14/01/2026 11:46, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Track failed SHMTI accesses and received notifications. > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c > index 16bcdcdc1dc3..443e032a3553 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > #include "protocols.h" > #include "notify.h" > > +#include > + > /* Updated only after ALL the mandatory features for that version are merged */ > #define SCMI_PROTOCOL_SUPPORTED_VERSION 0x10000 > > @@ -1366,8 +1368,10 @@ static void scmi_telemetry_tdcf_blkts_parse(struct telemetry_info *ti, > > /* Check for spec compliance */ > if (USE_LINE_TS(payld) || USE_BLK_TS(payld) || > - DATA_INVALID(payld) || (PAYLD_ID(payld) != 0)) > + DATA_INVALID(payld) || (PAYLD_ID(payld) != 0)) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(0, "BLK_TS_INVALID", 0, 0); > return; > + } > > /* A BLK_TS descriptor MUST be returned: it is found or it is crated */ > bts = scmi_telemetry_blkts_lookup(ti->ph->dev, &ti->xa_bts, payld); > @@ -1376,6 +1380,9 @@ static void scmi_telemetry_tdcf_blkts_parse(struct telemetry_info *ti, > > /* Update the descriptor with the lastest TS*/ > scmi_telemetry_blkts_update(shmti->last_magic, bts); > + > + trace_scmi_tlm_collect(bts->last_ts, (u64)payld, > + bts->last_magic, "SHMTI_BLK_TS"); > } > > static void scmi_telemetry_tdcf_data_parse(struct telemetry_info *ti, > @@ -1393,8 +1400,10 @@ static void scmi_telemetry_tdcf_data_parse(struct telemetry_info *ti, > /* Is thi DE ID know ? */ > tde = scmi_telemetry_tde_lookup(ti, de_id); > if (!tde) { > - if (mode != SCAN_DISCOVERY) > + if (mode != SCAN_DISCOVERY) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(de_id, "DE_INVALID", 0, 0); > return; > + } > > /* In SCAN_DISCOVERY mode we allocate new DEs for unknown IDs */ > tde = scmi_telemetry_tde_get(ti, de_id); > @@ -1462,6 +1471,8 @@ static void scmi_telemetry_tdcf_data_parse(struct telemetry_info *ti, > tde->last_ts = tstamp; > else > tde->last_ts = 0; > + > + trace_scmi_tlm_collect(0, tde->de.info->id, tde->last_val, "SHMTI_DE_UPDT"); tde->last_ts instead of 0? > } > > static int scmi_telemetry_tdcf_line_parse(struct telemetry_info *ti, > @@ -1507,8 +1518,10 @@ static int scmi_telemetry_shmti_scan(struct telemetry_info *ti, > fsleep((SCMI_TLM_TDCF_MAX_RETRIES - retries) * 1000); > > startm = TDCF_START_SEQ_GET(tdcf); > - if (IS_BAD_START_SEQ(startm)) > + if (IS_BAD_START_SEQ(startm)) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(0, "MSEQ_BADSTART", startm, 0); > continue; > + } > > /* On a BAD_SEQ this will be updated on the next attempt */ > shmti->last_magic = startm; > @@ -1520,18 +1533,25 @@ static int scmi_telemetry_shmti_scan(struct telemetry_info *ti, > > used_qwords = scmi_telemetry_tdcf_line_parse(ti, next, > shmti, mode); > - if (qwords < used_qwords) > + if (qwords < used_qwords) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(PAYLD_ID(next), > + "BAD_QWORDS", startm, 0); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > next += used_qwords * 8; > qwords -= used_qwords; > } > > endm = TDCF_END_SEQ_GET(eplg); > + if (startm != endm) > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(0, "MSEQ_MISMATCH", startm, endm); > } while (startm != endm && --retries); > > - if (startm != endm) > + if (startm != endm) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(0, "TDCF_SCAN_FAIL", startm, endm); > return -EPROTO; > + } > > return 0; > } > @@ -1923,6 +1943,8 @@ static void scmi_telemetry_scan_update(struct telemetry_info *ti, u64 ts) > tde->last_ts = tstamp; > else > tde->last_ts = 0; > + > + trace_scmi_tlm_collect(ts, tde->de.info->id, tde->last_val, "FC_UPDATE"); tde->last_ts instead of ts? > } > } > > @@ -2001,8 +2023,11 @@ static int scmi_telemetry_tdcf_de_parse(struct telemetry_de *tde, > fsleep((SCMI_TLM_TDCF_MAX_RETRIES - retries) * 1000); > > startm = TDCF_START_SEQ_GET(tdcf); > - if (IS_BAD_START_SEQ(startm)) > + if (IS_BAD_START_SEQ(startm)) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(tde->de.info->id, "MSEQ_BADSTART", > + startm, 0); > continue; > + } > > /* Has anything changed at all at the SHMTI level ? */ > scoped_guard(mutex, &tde->mtx) { > @@ -2018,11 +2043,16 @@ static int scmi_telemetry_tdcf_de_parse(struct telemetry_de *tde, > if (DATA_INVALID(payld)) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (IS_BLK_TS(payld)) > + if (IS_BLK_TS(payld)) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(tde->de.info->id, > + "BAD_DE_META", 0, 0); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > - if (PAYLD_ID(payld) != tde->de.info->id) > + if (PAYLD_ID(payld) != tde->de.info->id) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(tde->de.info->id, "DE_INVALID", 0, 0); > return -EINVAL; > + } > > /* Data is always valid since NOT handling BLK TS lines here */ > *val = LINE_DATA_GET(&payld->l); > @@ -2046,10 +2076,16 @@ static int scmi_telemetry_tdcf_de_parse(struct telemetry_de *tde, > } > > endm = TDCF_END_SEQ_GET(tde->eplg); > + if (startm != endm) > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(tde->de.info->id, "MSEQ_MISMATCH", > + startm, endm); > } while (startm != endm && --retries); > > - if (startm != endm) > + if (startm != endm) { > + trace_scmi_tlm_access(tde->de.info->id, "TDCF_DE_FAIL", > + startm, endm); > return -EPROTO; > + } > > guard(mutex)(&tde->mtx); > tde->last_magic = startm; > @@ -2230,6 +2266,9 @@ scmi_telemetry_msg_payld_process(struct telemetry_info *ti, > tde->last_ts = LINE_TSTAMP_GET(&payld->tsl); > else > tde->last_ts = 0; > + > + trace_scmi_tlm_collect(timestamp, tde->de.info->id, tde->last_val, > + "MESSAGE"); tde->last_ts instead of timestamp? If I understand correctly, tde->last_ts corresponds to the time coming from the platform. We have kernel time anyway coming from ftrace format. > } > } > Thanks, Elif