From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
davem@davemloft.net, "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Maxime Coquelin" <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"Alexandre Torgue" <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
"Emil Renner Berthing" <kernel@esmil.dk>,
"Minda Chen" <minda.chen@starfivetech.com>,
"Neil Armstrong" <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@baylibre.com>,
"Jerome Brunet" <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
"Martin Blumenstingl" <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
"Jan Petrous" <jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com>,
"Ovidiu Panait" <ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>,
Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Check multiple MMC counters
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:14:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d6e75eb-be26-47a2-96de-d29c0b634bfc@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826140500.616466-2-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 04:04:53PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> The MMC counters report MAC statistics. Multiple counters can be
> enabled when the IP is integrated, however there's no way to know
> exactly which ones. Un-implemented counters seem to report 0.
>
> It was found that on StarFive JH7110 and Amlogic SM1, the counter that's
> used by the selftest (mmc_tx_framecount_g) isn't implemented, triggering
> an MMC selftest failure.
>
> Both the above SoCs seem to implement mmc_rx_framecount_gb, let's use
> this counter as well for MMC counter validation.
>
> Note that this doesn't guarantee that we won't encounter the same issue
> again if another IP implements yet another set of counters that don't
> include that new one.
>
> If the game of whack-a-mole with implemented counters becomes too hard to
> maintain, we may simply consider removing the MMC selftest entirely.
>
> Fixes: 091810dbded9 ("net: stmmac: Introduce selftests support")
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Seems sensible.
If more moles need whacking, we could consider the value of 0 as
success.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-26 14:04 [PATCH net 0/6] net: stmmac: More selftest related fixes Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 14:04 ` [PATCH net 1/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Check multiple MMC counters Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 17:14 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2026-08-26 20:24 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 14:04 ` [PATCH net 2/6] net: stmmac: dwmac1000: Account for the primary MAC address for UC filtering Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 18:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-26 14:04 ` [PATCH net 3/6] net: stmmac: dwmac4: " Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 18:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-26 14:04 ` [PATCH net 4/6] net: stmmac: dwxgmac: " Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 18:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-26 14:04 ` [PATCH net 5/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Account for the UC filter list for filtering tests Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 18:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-26 20:21 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 14:04 ` [PATCH net 6/6] net: stmmac: selftests: Don't test flow control for small rx fifos Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-26 18:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-08-27 17:53 ` [PATCH net 0/6] net: stmmac: More selftest related fixes Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-27 20:16 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-08-27 20:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-27 19:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d6e75eb-be26-47a2-96de-d29c0b634bfc@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.petrous@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=minda.chen@starfivetech.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox