From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F21FC982E6 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:12:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Subject:cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=XW2kMLggkRWNkVt6ExhJhc6qzBTBSihv+LUgIX5RMcA=; b=MqcV0oo8nYMer+ScCnNCPQGbwj rWwXJsDsv6geRJSAiGbYVaRgvoWiSDHyZFTKOnFumT3XA9VhZjzrxWFuWnFkg/W7pRwdJ/1OiZhLC PTA7aMzm1VmSWei/cGr1j0xOQUpWU4S5E7MiB24iI03dl/CQkfzEw2fHpa+AAEOFkjQe2DkvsDY5I kmqsTdUctEhiyenqw3NEHfMBm64nqHSSjEsqCko7g/WT/MHw2qxK+EMHtCsNzVE2wPWBkade+f5lz weX/32+ZHCINkES0s+NdE4NXWSmAa+Jx+WvDoovkDyzfOyL9DEMDxMF2Hs2VNvM5qauXK27cKGnwj eTwwq61w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8iUv-000000035bM-0UW5; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:12:13 +0000 Received: from gentwo.org ([62.72.0.81]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8iUs-000000035an-0vwE for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:12:11 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gentwo.org; s=default; t=1790012833; bh=XW2kMLggkRWNkVt6ExhJhc6qzBTBSihv+LUgIX5RMcA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DsymiE1MQAtmEN6uUB15xdAYVJDZfNgJnj2uprYa57YqGKxBPw/trT1vR1DDzhUmO mG9CZX/7ouqOPVy1PfkrG6LJZR68SWo47gb09EdLmAGiAeSYTe398ITRq5Z08JDXrL 1zi94uzbdB0Ko5/ITaTybb562kwpWXK8p179l0Rc= Received: by gentwo.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 85E8E406E1; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BF2406DE; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 10:47:13 -0700 (PDT) From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" To: Ankur Arora cc: Haris Okanovic , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, david.laight.linux@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, joao.m.martins@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, ashok.bhat@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 12/16] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() In-Reply-To: <878q58z2ej.fsf@oracle.com> Message-ID: <3e8bda45-0aa7-d0be-8aad-dab95902dcde@gentwo.org> References: <20260831202251.305046-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> <20260831202251.305046-13-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> <178908146776.2725577.2613699832033292946.b4-review@b4> <878q58z2ej.fsf@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260921_111210_278287_0FF7EA45 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.62 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 11 Sep 2026, Ankur Arora wrote: > > Thanks for retesting. > > > The new unit tests all pass on both metal and virt variants of the same machines. > > > > I hope we can merge this soon. > > Yes indeed. I'll send out one more version which addresses a few minor > bot comments (and patch-1 needs a re-review because of changes.) > > But other than that this is as mergeable as it will ever be. I dont see it anywhere. Is this patchset scheduled to be merged?