From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 266EECC6B1A for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:26:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/27OLHjKCfoYXX3QS6shBfqd83AIp/PVTNTv8jw4t/c=; b=BjmuNF+1R2b4oE8g6TQdHVzik9 fwlPli9XonwYqIzbmO2u38DrTPtv1PPTwhQXpSDZpEmNkSryryhHNz0E2D9A0MSHXYLjY4h8ES8N9 FSj5ghrLYFBtQFmrpkqBt7ytT/D3w3NEvERwX1uzxNtz3q9XO5+FBx9VglXfoH5jwJ+fEKdksk1c5 s7Iab2GONNT4Lcua+9LM1fEmwqB3TYDelBHYlSQW47QdlgzVTduPGN7FI3q0KpAkcmQ8SvWPjr9L3 iSyGOXOTouDzK5lvY6oMI4fyrVD6hjD+NpZmM3YlJkenhbGWE5EGjrV4/mmJm9NyTPdle/hgV0nov XvlhULgg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xGtNj-0000000El7d-2AAr; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:26:35 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xGtNe-0000000El6g-1eYN for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:26:34 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1791962787; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/27OLHjKCfoYXX3QS6shBfqd83AIp/PVTNTv8jw4t/c=; b=N0hiOUnRaA88o+DnFrarQ4htsGwLYpXycv0cPXtD6VKCRUfiVvKg1LC3QQl9u5MBVgHAmc lPciiIhq3T1tyuVGppdtkaX02Oyo+/1LxH8MfMjn06Ws1xLCOlaH2IFMvhXpZrxLP+MDQO w03aCg077N8ICWwFrgDP3V1KfJW7Hhk= Received: from mail-pj1-f70.google.com (mail-pj1-f70.google.com [209.85.216.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-491-JA9RYXPIOKyBAXF2imS0KA-1; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 07:26:26 +0000 X-MC-Unique: JA9RYXPIOKyBAXF2imS0KA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: JA9RYXPIOKyBAXF2imS0KA_1791962785 Received: by mail-pj1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3a47617a0b3so3370230a91.2 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:26:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1791962785; x=1792567585; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=/27OLHjKCfoYXX3QS6shBfqd83AIp/PVTNTv8jw4t/c=; b=u5aU2RDjwral+W52AwCU287RqenaikkvBSJ/ZUyhzHHC+zLxBooC27B3zkL0AM7MTe FGOexvd0uzm3E/tVQcOBuz5p4muAXeVyvyM6hpUnDpdCUM0lrIOGlegQwplI4T4rBAYe HOOirauKHwAEaD/kZvYkfzt8GhUqcWjFxALWaVzNRVkNFByjorDcO3hOShcchJjPH4U/ 9azQGf4WbgnmuMWxiQHiassMQnng+KKnwtqcQ98Q44mAoeNoywXVJWhxxQ7K4+6kc6IK 6DJbXK2wYanTcZxf+ftZ5MtDSVeUUJfjeKfLtzmZpwHp5EAv9dr8N3NSJdIS+zd/7JsN nVlA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxq2onsSKDR2Ee2lIoxwiupQv1eF9RBpvzK4Sk90Ph4RXFAlAiRM2zb8wySLQRZYJeSBF2c65BwS8pLEiUz5eok@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYJYgxlxks+cv+sIQheNtap4/aYOyvr7F6UsEv10qzUlSnx6b6CP 9YocmWtNZ+t76yDnTTYGgYpeoSxaOq9edvpiLYF68N/NkUENHB/fYjoQcFUmv21Gu7X1TSq4mhN L/qTUF4KX5047T8oC4vuQVSnY0xOZ+C8Bi3YxaQPcRVp+hsCwiL6hRPy4s+jC0CFlzBeKUkhL1o Fp X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou3IFKntsAnVdXd8p3Uq2Hiw+sNKuV+YcI9mo0TFda8gnpyg3l91urWCvarecAJ 7ovwgOYVFlvEvW7frOAFWhlx+I3qIDtg4ZeSicZBTEtmyah5gNOz29VIYaLHsaMBEcWxEnHZVWY jwL59mfLqEDylKSK0Ccybzh1Rpx+k2IK0DkC5IVnjFV4UHAKKaUBICXXlgJA8NS8fwdazJlmPDY lW8R3KTnWwjaVZvn13jEHqt2vRHJ/k5cZwNpSLqBxitmslrVsNfABKcAnjfVTsP0Y+qHFSfEIVV 5Pv/pxzdJqCny44Gy0vQ7SWdrI9QAX8HYr2wCU8HWDkEBU90A0ER8rMlLrn0L5bp2lWBM/CfbgB 2vhwrHlB/LKz8sSIKgTSL1qkkEIU4H2zyAxNs5mBzHA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:224e:b0:3a0:ace4:d2b4 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3ab3a9f42aamr10847030a91.23.1791962784922; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:26:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:224e:b0:3a0:ace4:d2b4 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3ab3a9f42aamr10847017a91.23.1791962784459; Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:26:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.68.52] (n175-34-8-244.mrk21.qld.optusnet.com.au. [175.34.8.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3ac5f280fecsm3307221a91.13.2026.10.14.00.26.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3fbd4739-a4eb-4428-95ae-ead22e7cf9f2@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 17:26:14 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 02/10] firmware: arm_rmm: Check for RMI support at init To: Suzuki K Poulose , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com, fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, enju.kohei@fujitsu.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com References: <20261002061507.1600269-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <20261002061507.1600269-3-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <2586e689-c27d-4e4c-8c69-03e24259cb96@redhat.com> <8be050e3-8af1-4f04-902f-9bc01b209dd0@arm.com> From: Gavin Shan In-Reply-To: <8be050e3-8af1-4f04-902f-9bc01b209dd0@arm.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: oiDGPNUcJd0d_EJlLa6ZLdjzFGTzUvLDuKpbHzwmnok_1791962785 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261014_002632_868113_A63DE831 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 23.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 10/13/26 7:58 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 13/10/2026 04:53, Gavin Shan wrote: >> Hi Suzuki, >> >> On 10/2/26 4:14 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >>> From: Steven Price >>> >>> Query the RMI version number and check if it is a compatible version. >>> All RMM feature registers are read and exposed for future code to >>> use. Also restrict the support to SMC conduit. >>> >>> We only support this for Little Endian kernels, the Big Endian kernel >>> support is anyway marked BROKEN and is being removed. >>> >>> Cc: Marc Zyngier >>> Cc: Oliver Upton >>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron >>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan >>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas >>> Tested-by: Gavin Shan >>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price >>> Co-developed-by: Suzuki K Poulose >>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose >>> --- >> >> [...] >> >>> --- >>>   MAINTAINERS                       |   2 + >>>   arch/arm64/Kconfig                |   1 + >>>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c    |   1 + >>>   arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         |   2 + >>>   drivers/firmware/Kconfig          |   1 + >>>   drivers/firmware/Makefile         |   1 + >>>   drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Kconfig  |  25 +++++++ >>>   drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Makefile |   1 + >>>   drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c    | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>   include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h      |  48 +++++++++++++ >>>   10 files changed, 194 insertions(+) >>>   create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Kconfig >>>   create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/Makefile >>>   create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c >>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/arm-rmi-cmds.h >>> >> >> [...] >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c b/drivers/firmware/ arm_rmm/rmi.c >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000000000..06f5392c982d2 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_rmm/rmi.c >>> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>> +/* >>> + * Copyright (C) 2023-2026 ARM Ltd. >>> + */ >>> + >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> + >>> +#include >>> +#include >>> + >>> +/* RMM v2.0 defines RmiFeatureRegister0 to RmiFeatureRegister4. */ >>> +static unsigned long rmi_feat_reg_cache[5] __ro_after_init; >>> + >>> +static int rmi_check_version(void) >>> +{ >>> +    unsigned short version_major, version_minor; >>> +    unsigned long host_version = RMI_ABI_VERSION(RMI_ABI_MAJOR_VERSION, >>> +                             RMI_ABI_MINOR_VERSION); >>> +    unsigned long aa64pfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1); >>> +    struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res = { >>> +        SMC_RMI_VERSION, host_version, >>> +    }; >>> + >>> +    /* If RME isn't supported, then RMI can't be */ >>> +    if (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(aa64pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_RME_SHIFT) == 0) >>> +        return -ENXIO; >>> + >>> +    if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC) >>> +        return -ENXIO; >> >> I think we need to ensure SMCCC version is v1.2 or a newer one here? arm_smccc_1_2_smc() >> is immediately called by rmi_smccc_invoke() after this check. >> >>      if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC || >>              arm_smccc_get_version() < ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_2) > > We could. But I am wondering if that adds any value ? If the RMM > exists and responds to the RMI_ABI_VERSION, it must be so on a > platform with v1.2 or greater ? The extra check doesn't hurt. > It's required as documented in section "B1.1 overview" of RMM-spec-v2.0-bet3. In the same section, there are more requirements regarding the SMCCC version when SVE/SME are supported. I don't see a practical problem if the check is missed since the combination of TF-A and TF-RMM are the only RMM-spec-v2.0-bet3 implementation (as I knew) where the SMCCC version has been set to v1.5 in the 'master' branch. Thanks, Gavin > Suzuki > >>          return -ENXIO; >> >> Thanks, >> Gavin >> >>> + >>> +    rmi_smccc_invoke(&res); >>> +    if (res.a0 == SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) >>> +        return -ENXIO; >>> + >>> +    version_major = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MAJOR(res.a1); >>> +    version_minor = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MINOR(res.a1); >>> + >>> +    if (res.a0 != RMI_SUCCESS) { >>> +        unsigned short high_version_major, high_version_minor; >>> + >>> +        high_version_major = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MAJOR(res.a2); >>> +        high_version_minor = RMI_ABI_VERSION_GET_MINOR(res.a2); >>> + >>> +        pr_err("Unsupported RMI ABI (v%d.%d - v%d.%d) we want v%d.%d\n", >>> +               version_major, version_minor, >>> +               high_version_major, high_version_minor, >>> +               RMI_ABI_MAJOR_VERSION, >>> +               RMI_ABI_MINOR_VERSION); >>> +        return -ENXIO; >>> +    } >>> + >>> +    pr_info("RMI ABI version %d.%d\n", version_major, version_minor); >>> + >>> +    return 0; >>> +} >>> + >> >> [...] >> >> >> >