[PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-11T14:50:01Z

On Wednesday 11 May 2016 19:16:44 Zhangjian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016/5/11 18:12, Zhangjian (Bamvor) wrote:
> > Hi, Arnd
> >
> > On 2016/5/11 16:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 11 May 2016 10:04:16 Zhangjian wrote:
> > >>> I don't remember. It's probably not important whether we have the shift
> > >>> in there, as long as it's independent of the actual kernel page size and
> > >>> user space and kernel agree on the calling conventions.
> > >> Well. I am ok with where to shift the pages size because we get the same
> > >> result. I was just thinking if we should get rid of the name of mmap2 in our
> > >> ILP32 porting. Actually, it is mmap but we name it as mmap2. User may confused
> > >> if they do not know the implementations.
> > >
> > > That is a good point: If the implementation matches the mmap() behavior rather than
> > > mmap2(), we should rename the macro by doing
> > >
> > > #undef __NR_mmap2
> > > #define __NR_mmap 222
> > >
> > > in the uapi/asm/unistd.h file for ilp32 mode.
> > Do you mean define the following things in kernel:
> > ```
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> > index 1caadc2..3f79640 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> > @@ -14,3 +14,9 @@
> > * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> > */
> > #include <asm-generic/unistd.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef __ILP32__
> > +#undef __NR_mmap2
> > +#define __NR_mmap 222
> > +#endif /* #ifdef __ILP32__ */
> > +
> > ```
> > Then glibc could call mmap instead of mmap2.
> > I could not try it now. Because after change off_t to 64bit in glibc, stat
> > is fail. I may need to revert the stat relative patch.
> After revert stat relative patch in glibc, mmap01-mmap14 success. But mmap16
> success with segfault. I will investigate it later.
>
> There is pointer and size_t in mmap, so, IIUC, we need to clear the top halves
> of register by using COMPAT_SYSCALL_WRAP6.

Correct, good catch!

> And after check the function in
> arch/s390/kernel/compat_linux.c, I feel that we need to do the same thing for
> pread64 and pwrite64.
>

> But I got following error when I try to add
> COMPAT_SYSCALL_WRAP4(pread64, unsigned int, fd, char __user *, buf,
> size_t, count, loff_t, pos);
> COMPAT_SYSCALL_WRAP4(pwrite64, unsigned int, fd, const char __user *, buf,
> size_t, count, loff_t, pos);
>

Hmm, that is indeed tricky. I think COMPAT_SYSCALL_WRAP4 rightfully
refuses the loff_t argument here, as the common case is that this is
not possible.

Can you open-code this using a COMPAT_SYSCALL4 definition similar to what
arch/tile has, but without the merging of the two halves of the argument?

Arnd