From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D09BBC52D73 for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2024 18:25:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=O3At3Lt617yrAHTqVUrE1kzkIabTIf1meSm3wUIRmOY=; b=Nuku4y/du8pyKwt3WDeW3seLp1 OooC4PgkdfFlh3KJDAP1Jl5TTtcAGZXN3USZJMWhsy7WWuUyLtalfyYR5POjb9mgvapIirlW/BiUP SmHIr+QloKgnMQDkp4C3ECBD998t6cglz3rWxWglJn4gLv24bh41IgA1B8jIr7kaFu8jE5WjqlgWf js0jzjLru+OBS/zQ+YFyZS1xcHhjO6JPK7t5WNYzaz/V6MDJrrg/Kw0BodYI9X4C9vdxVxtIqVUEa yfk4eUGVwOCm2jGok5WS4e3tzGHpZtTt6xvOrsHu/xPEcy/cmmSjY07i4lapV/VfMKwHSYT57bgWS 480vJfdQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sblLx-00000005wTo-0ML5; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 18:25:41 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1sblLO-00000005wNJ-1kO2; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 18:25:07 +0000 Received: from i53875a9f.versanet.de ([83.135.90.159] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sblL6-0002jz-NF; Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:24:48 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Dragan Simic , Florian Klink Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Sebastian Reichel , Kever Yang , Muhammed Efe Cetin , FUKAUMI Naoki , =?utf-8?B?VGFtw6FzIFN6xbFjcw==?= , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rfkill node for M.2 E wifi on orangepi-5-plus Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 20:24:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4124439.ReJHH8Nr61@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20240807162001.1737829-1-flokli@flokli.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240807_112506_516736_12FED928 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2024, 20:14:24 CEST schrieb Florian Klink: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 07:24:27PM GMT, Dragan Simic wrote: > >On 2024-08-07 19:00, Florian Klink wrote: > >>This follows the same logic as 82d40b141a4c ("arm64: dts: rockchip: add > >>rfkill node for M.2 Key E WiFi on rock-5b"). > >> > >>On the orangepi-5-plus, there's also a GPIO pin connecting the WiFi > >>enable signal inside the M.2 Key E slot. > >> > >>The exact GPIO PIN can be validated in the Armbian rk-5.10-rkr4 kernel > >>rk3588-orangepi-5-plus.dtsi file [1], which contains a `wifi_disable` > >>node referencing RK_PC4 on &gpio0. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Florian Klink > >>Tested-by: Florian Klink > > > >I forgot to mention that providing a Tested-by tag is redundant when > >there's already a Signed-off-by tag, because the latter already implies > >the former. > > This came after I sent the v3. Generally I wish people would test things > - though too often it's not. I explicitly tested this to work (with a > wifi module added to that slot being unblock-able afterwards), and > wanted to point that out, thus adding the Tested-by. > > DCO 1.1 doesn't say anything about Tested-by, it's mostly legalese about > being allowed to send out the patch, and understanding the consequences > regarding licensing. It doesn't require the person adding their > Signed-Off-By to have tested it. While the DCO may not say it, everyone else will simply require it though ;-) . Aka no maintainer will apply a patch without the submitter having tested their change. This is just implicitly expected. Like if it comes to light later that the change was not tested before submission that creates quite a trust-issue between submitter and maintainer on future submissions. Heiko