From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:36:36 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/19] pinctrl: exynos: Add support for Exynos5433 In-Reply-To: References: <1417073716-22997-1-git-send-email-cw00.choi@samsung.com> <3904347.Bp2gmpYM49@wuerfel> Message-ID: <4132795.KBVIQFTevx@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 27 November 2014 21:14:59 Tomasz Figa wrote: > > my impression is that with the > > move to arm64, you should come up with a new binding that can fully > > describe each controller so you don't have to add new code and bindings > > for each future SoC that uses the same scheme. > > Still, this is exactly the same thing I thought when initially refactoring this > driver 2 years ago and what was dismissed at that time due to people > supposedly not wanting that much data in DT. If this point of view has changed, > then I fully support your view, though. I guess people were at the time underestimating the rate at which Samsung comes out with new SoC variants that are all slightly different. Arnd