From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D822C433F5 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:36:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=RFz9WawAH4dIiwWdxtvBFNtBA7qdxtiQg63rx2wrJCc=; b=KvpK1LAZuG7YgQ Wis2pRltKvuEHs6ZKbV4/32pFyaHaoNPzcdpc/VXZBP8zprjvXmTgRR5bIVD2CwymK691joRBv86H fPuVOiftS4lQXTfZAz+/BJj08snZfTTpdrxH7+mltE66zsncppbGvsA5cNYdycT4+XU6CBLReZKsg DGFz9ak3lSUivDbXcU6dwLR2FmhOV+7kBSD7JgVim9owtrMoySibB5bb9Qph7mz42uzMGxA1eoynU pIjTMxkFqveA35DLLjvEyg3jz/cCBxx5lvp1viHjOHuL3lnWkoKPBZgnsUf/PnCDT1lIs6ooVqqIw UlkiHxBmevZGBHDxE5Qg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nRyLB-009B1l-7x; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:35:05 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nRyL7-009B0u-S2 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 15:35:03 +0000 Received: from [192.168.254.32] (unknown [47.189.24.195]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77DC220B7178; Wed, 9 Mar 2022 07:34:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 77DC220B7178 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1646840100; bh=dB1K0ZwGrg+HvxpbL6qUnjdr8grOY0ZQJDOVuW9N3Co=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=sFllom38SHSpNWowxpHJXybN92PrbdJINamo/Nix55dwRs7bnNb8PVTb7j2ROrB4H xnxrjatiYQ2ZrFKMnmpgHgYQZD4oXi1i0kdJckVwPw/8WzHvbKV0eBY+lzf3+2wr15 19BNhxW2NJGCd37Xolwu39xCzPzY/BElmjqewE/Q= Message-ID: <416e0757-46fe-b290-cb8b-cd766f9cbdb6@linux.microsoft.com> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:34:58 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind() Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f> <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20220117145608.6781-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <845e4589-97d9-5371-3a0e-f6e05919f32d@linux.microsoft.com> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220309_073502_022091_01FC8BA3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 3/9/22 05:47, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:00:35PM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: > >> It is just that patch 11 that defines "select >> HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE" did not receive any comments from you >> (unless I missed a comment that came from you. That is entirely >> possible. If I missed it, my bad). Since you suggested that change, I >> just wanted to make sure that that patch looks OK to you. > > I think that's more a question for the livepatch people to be honest - > it's not entirely a technical one, there's a bunch of confidence level > stuff going on. For example there was some suggestion that people might > insist on having objtool support, though there's also substantial > pushback on making objtool a requirement for anything from other > quarters. I was hoping that posting that patch would provoke some > discussion about what exactly is needed but that's not happened thus > far. Understood. In that case, I will remove that patch because it is not really required for my current work on the unwinder. I will bring this up later in a different patch series where it will trigger a discussion. Thanks. Madhavan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel