From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F88CC83F03 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2025 10:49:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=1csdPJkrYHqiTa7aBB4h7tPO9DoYuuIveSxw3PXJbts=; b=1ID8MfKsXdsVHLsxa63itQf9WO 0S2WD52WTtYSi35E2EhWrrjpAQd0Aegi7d/qNlokVRbZYeFPNxKT47i2vrTlAoHGlKS7nJsMSX7l1 SM2+dW0W1ZOXtJtzb1lq6jogTnKQV/PlVY1QwXIYlE9sG06lyjddLG3uEsm+eRBm2FTmYgfWFG7a6 RAXV208yIyGC5nmChzaaNKNQg7Gm2Bk5F6cD2y2mxjcPabyoUyfu34caYrGZl9rt8xOIjNCP6mswE OYaa5laH3HpR2eHIV63mWtQvHhibG4KCpnIv/AeNjWmTEoS/GYV6oR6pvNP1mAWpe+XiB5cYuFuMZ eERs7R6A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uYMwO-000000009LT-2QkA; Sun, 06 Jul 2025 10:49:48 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uYMtU-0000000099D-3Anq; Sun, 06 Jul 2025 10:46:49 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To; bh=1csdPJkrYHqiTa7aBB4h7tPO9DoYuuIveSxw3PXJbts=; b=Fv7E4uY+Zu9UYX7fPZFpy6q6Fn 4qZleqGkmvnnsKgTWZalmNha82+2YZxq21TUUsgBclr3OO9eQ2wEcv5puHoYGgVyP/J07OZBhRsAY uCy5DyjvCYgO4yuiEfLjAHOaMC/PWOrfEJ4MkFk6vvRP3ZMkF0q3Oa/HqWRjVFvqr4vwB0Fr4qm7O BRXdTRhGtCmeL5El4kJ7JJ8J1PsQMORmIw7bZe/T6jyqegTYDJCsJgzdY/CBbSzSq34+Yy+/C+LWx RMFzxrAK4NrmIUo/Oaq+s+yTBJAipo/tyvE8PKUDZhXsvDVMmBx+vrve3XUiIIDxhTqMGj6xxAtIh T1KPJGzg==; Received: from i53875a35.versanet.de ([83.135.90.53] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uYMt8-0002wB-6E; Sun, 06 Jul 2025 12:46:26 +0200 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Piotr Zalewski , Diederik de Haas Cc: hjc@rock-chips.com, andy.yan@rock-chips.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rockchip/drm: vop2: make vp registers nonvolatile Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2025 12:46:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4207630.fIoEIV5pvu@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20250706083629.140332-2-pZ010001011111@proton.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250706_034648_797864_921F0BB4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.27 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Am Sonntag, 6. Juli 2025, 12:37:40 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit schrie= b Diederik de Haas: > Hi Piotr, >=20 > On Sun Jul 6, 2025 at 12:20 PM CEST, Piotr Zalewski wrote: > >> With a new version of a patch, you're supposed to add the tags you > >> received for previous versions, like my Tested-by tag [1]. > >>=20 > >> (unless the new version has changed so much you feel they should not be > >> carried over; you then need to explicitly describe that and why you > >> dropped them) > > =20 > > Forgot... Should i send it as PATCH v2 RESEND? >=20 > I don't think that's needed; the maintainer will let you know if that's > desirable or that they will add it (back) when committing. The problem is then remembering to manually collect the tags from a previous series. =46or my reference, it was Tested-by: Diederik de Haas So hopefully I'll remember now :-) and there is no need for a resend at this time. Heiko