public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA where needed
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:30:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4275868.O962kiiyJa@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535F8594.40609@metafoo.de>

On Tuesday 29 April 2014 12:57:24 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 12:37 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 April 2014 07:07:33 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> >> Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:12:14 +0200 ?? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> >>> On Tuesday 29 April 2014 00:35:41 Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> So, I don't understand why this error happen, as well as I can not
> >>>> reproduce this...
> >>>
> >>> It's probably CONFIG_SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA=m and CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SSI=y then.
> >>> What is the intended behavior in this case? Should CONFIG_SND_SOC_FSL_SSI
> >>> be forced to be a module as well?
> >>
> >> Hmm, yes...
> >> I thought that I had already solved a similar problem for the earlier
> >> version of the patch ...
> >
> > How about this?
> 
> Having FSL_SSI/FSL_SPDIF, but not SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA does not make sense on 
> iMX.
> So how about:
> 
>         select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA if SND_IMX_SOC
> 
> and remove all the other 'select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA' statements. That's in 
> my opinion much nicer.

Yes, makes sense. Should I do another version of the patch?

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-28 14:46 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: select SND_SOC_IMX_PCM_DMA where needed Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-28 18:46 ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-04-28 19:52   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-28 20:35     ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-04-28 21:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29  3:07         ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-04-29 10:37           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29 10:57             ` [alsa-devel] " Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-29 13:30               ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-04-29 14:30                 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-04-29 16:56                   ` Mark Brown
2014-04-29 19:16                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-29 19:36                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-01 20:54                         ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4275868.O962kiiyJa@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox