From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ray.jui@broadcom.com (Ray Jui) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 16:50:57 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/6] Documentation: DT: Consolidate SP805 binding docs In-Reply-To: <20180627185529.GB19743@roeck-us.net> References: <1527530497-10392-2-git-send-email-ray.jui@broadcom.com> <20180605194124.GA26885@rob-hp-laptop> <09c870cd-0a44-6634-58d8-f57f9fcd0cb5@broadcom.com> <46ca340f-4347-94ca-6463-d38bece820e2@broadcom.com> <20180627183327.GD16753@roeck-us.net> <20180627184234.GA19538@roeck-us.net> <8483f675-0c7d-4b0f-25fd-a5eff4bc7937@broadcom.com> <20180627185529.GB19743@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <42b856bf-2dc1-f69b-44e1-f5a04715f673@broadcom.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Guenter/Florian, On 6/27/2018 11:55 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >> >> >> On 6/27/2018 11:42 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:38:48AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/27/2018 11:33 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:39:16AM -0700, Ray Jui wrote: >>>>>> Hi Guenter/Rob, >>>>>> >>>>>> Kindly let me know how you want to proceed with this? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I recall correctly, the patch series does not add a new problem >>>>> but merely exposes one. Is my recollection correct ? If so, maybe >>>>> we should just add a note somewhere indicating what might be wrong >>>>> and otherwise apply the series. >>>>> >>>>> Does this make sense ? >>>> >>>> Yes this makes a lot of sense to me. This patch series exposes potential >>>> problems in some SoCs that they might not be feeding the correct clock into >>>> WDT, at least based on clock names from their DT entries. >>>> >>>> This patch series does not change/affect how SP805 works on those systems. >>>> >>>> Where should the note be added? >>>> >>> >>> I would suggest to add a note into the driver where the clock is used, >>> with the details discussed here. >> >> I assume you meant adding the notes to the SP805 driver where the clock is >> used. >> >> If so, I think that makes sense. That notes deserves its own patch because >> it really has nothing to do with any of the change in this patch series. >> >> Do you want me to 1) embed that patch into this patch series and send out >> v5; or 2) leave the patch series as it is and send out a separate patch to >> add the notes to the driver? >> > 2) is fine. I don't have the series here right now; if I recall correctly > all patches in the series are all marked as Reviewed-by: and/or Acked-by:. > If so, I'll apply them to my tree tonight, or at least the ones that will > go in through the watchdog tree. > > Guenter > Guenter, please let us know once you take the first 4 patches. Florian, could you please help with the last 2, once Guenter confirmed the first 4 are merged. Thanks! Ray